HMCM Central Bank of Issue
Proof of Unusual Daring.
HMCM Central Bank of Issue (HMCM CBOI) is wholly owned by the court recognized and accredited sovereign Cynthia Mildred Miles. See certified court records. Did you know that money supply from currency exchanges does NOT cause inflation? Unlike odious debt, which DOES! Did you know money brought home from a sovereign is EXEMPT from United Nations Charter, Article 104 and International Monetary Fund regulations? At HMCM CBOI we understand freedom to regulate matters. Particularly when peoples’ lives are at stake. Where ordinary measures have failed miserably, Cynthia—in her court certified personal legal capacity, offers extraordinary privacy and protection. Benefiting local communities with more resources. As all law is established for the benefit of humankind let us not forget we’re family. HMCM Central Bank of Issue...Because getting the funding you need shouldn't sacrifice policy making!
Amos 8:1-14 KJV — Thus hath the Lord GOD shewed unto me: and behold a basket of summer fruit. And he said, Amos, what seest thou? And I said, A basket of summer fruit. Then said the LORD unto me, The end is come upon my people of Israel; I will not again pass by them any more. And the songs of the temple shall be howlings in that day, saith the Lord GOD: there shall be many dead bodies in every place; they shall cast them forth with silence. Hear this, O ye that swallow up the needy, even to make the poor of the land to fail, Saying, When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn? and the sabbath, that we may set forth wheat, making the ephah small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit? That we may buy the poor for silver, and the needy for a pair of shoes; yea, and sell the refuse of the wheat? The LORD hath sworn by the excellency of Jacob, Surely I will never forget any of their works. Shall not the land tremble for this, and every one mourn that dwelleth therein? and it shall rise up wholly as a flood; and it shall be cast out and drowned, as by the flood of Egypt. And it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord GOD, that I will cause the sun to go down at noon, and I will darken the earth in the clear day: And I will turn your feasts into mourning, and all your songs into lamentation; and I will bring up sackcloth upon all loins, and baldness upon every head; and I will make it as the mourning of an only son, and the end thereof as a bitter day. Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD: And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the LORD, and shall not find it. In that day shall the fair virgins and young men faint for thirst. They that swear by the sin of Samaria, and say, Thy god, O Dan, liveth; and, The manner of Beersheba liveth; even they shall fall, and never rise up again.
Hebrews 10:1-27 KJV — For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect. For then would they not have ceased to be offered? because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins. But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins. Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me: In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin thou hast had no pleasure. Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of me,) to do thy will, O God. Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law; Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, O God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second. By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins: But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified. Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before, This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them; And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more. Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin. Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us, through the veil, that is to say, his flesh; And having an high priest over the house of God; Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water. Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised;) And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching. For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries.
Matthew 25:31-46 KJV — When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee? Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.
Matthew 22:36-46 KJV — Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David. He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying, The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool? If David then call him Lord, how is he his son? And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions.
U.S. Supreme Court
Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306 (1952)
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.
[Emphasis added. Footnotes omitted.]
New York City has a program which permits its public schools to release students during the school day so that they may leave the school buildings and school grounds and go to religious centers for religious instruction or devotional exercises. A student is released on written request of his parents. Those not released stay in the classrooms. The churches make weekly reports to the schools, sending a list of children who have been released from public school but who have not reported for religious instruction.
This “released time” program involves neither religious instruction in public school classrooms nor the expenditure of public funds. All costs, including the application blanks, are paid by the religious organizations. The case is therefore unlike McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U. S. 203, which involved a “released time” program from Illinois. In that case the classrooms were turned over to religious instructors. We accordingly held that the program violated the First Amendment which (by reason of the Fourteenth Amendment) prohibits the states from establishing religion or prohibiting its free exercise.
Appellants, who are taxpayers and residents of New York City and whose children attend its public schools, challenge the present law, contending it is in essence not different from the one involved in the McCollum case. Their argument, stated elaborately in various ways, reduces itself to this: the weight and influence of the school is put behind a program for religious instruction; public school teachers police it, keeping tab on students who are released; the classroom activities come to a halt while the students who are released for religious instruction are on leave; the school is a crutch on which the churches are leaning for support in their religious training; without the cooperation of the schools this “released time” program, like the one in the McCollum case, would be futile and ineffective. The New York Court of Appeals sustained the law against this claim of unconstitutionality. 303 N. Y. 161, 100 N. E. 2d 463. The case is here on appeal. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2).
The briefs and arguments are replete with data bearing on the merits of this type of “released time” program. Views pro and con are expressed, based on practical experience with these programs and with their implications. We do not stop to summarize these materials nor to burden the opinion with an analysis of them. For they involve considerations not germane to the narrow constitutional issue presented. They largely concern the wisdom of the system, its efficiency from an educational point of view, and the political considerations which have motivated its adoption or rejection in some communities. Those matters are of no concern here, since our problem reduces itself to whether New York by this system has either prohibited the “free exercise” of religion or has made a law “respecting an establishment of religion” within the meaning of the First Amendment.
It takes obtuse reasoning to inject any issue of the “free exercise” of religion into the present case. No one is forced to go to the religious classroom and no religious exercise or instruction is brought to the classrooms of the public schools. A student need not take religious instruction. He is left to his own desires as to the manner or time of his religious devotions, if any.
There is a suggestion that the system involves the use of coercion to get public school students into religious classrooms. There is no evidence in the record before us that supports that conclusion. The present record indeed tells us that the school authorities are neutral in this regard and do no more than release students whose parents so request. If in fact coercion were used, if it were established that any one or more teachers were using their office to persuade or force students to take the religious instruction, a wholly different case would be presented. Hence we put aside that claim of coercion both as respects the “free exercise” of religion and “an establishment of religion” within the meaning of the First Amendment.
Moreover, apart from that claim of coercion, we do not see how New York by this type of “released time” program has made a law respecting an establishment of religion within the meaning of the First Amendment. There is much talk of the separation of Church and State in the history of the Bill of Rights and in the decisions clustering around the First Amendment. See Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U. S. 1; McCollum v. Board of Education, supra. There cannot be the slightest doubt that the First Amendment reflects the philosophy that Church and State should be separated. And so far as interference with the “free exercise” of religion and an “establishment” of religion are concerned, the separation must be complete and unequivocal. The First Amendment within the scope of its coverage permits no exception; the prohibition is absolute. The First Amendment, however, does not say that in every and all respects there shall be a separation of Church and State. Rather, it studiously defines the manner, the specific ways, in which there shall be no concert or union or dependency one on the other. That is the common sense of the matter. Otherwise the state and religion would be aliens to each other—hostile, suspicious, and even unfriendly. Churches could not be required to pay even property taxes. Municipalities would not be permitted to render police or fire protection to religious groups. Policemen who helped parishioners into their places of worship would violate the Constitution. Prayers in our legislative halls; the appeals to the Almighty in the messages of the Chief Executive; the proclamations making Thanksgiving Day a holiday; “so help me God” in our courtroom oaths— these and all other references to the Almighty that run through our laws, our public rituals, our ceremonies would be flouting the First Amendment. A fastidious atheist or agnostic could even object to the supplication with which the Court opens each session: “God save the United States and this Honorable Court.”
We would have to press the concept of separation of Church and State to these extremes to condemn the present law on constitutional grounds. The nullification of this law would have wide and profound effects. A Catholic student applies to his teacher for permission to leave the school during hours on a Holy Day of Obligation to attend a mass. A Jewish student asks his teacher for permission to be excused for Yom Kippur. A Protestant wants the afternoon off for a family baptismal ceremony. In each case the teacher requires parental consent in writing. In each case the teacher, in order to make sure the student is not a truant, goes further and requires a report from the priest, the rabbi, or the minister. The teacher in other words cooperates in a religious program to the extent of making it possible for her students to participate in it. Whether she does it occasionally for a few students, regularly for one, or pursuant to a systematized program designed to further the religious needs of all the students does not alter the character of the act.
We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being. We guarantee the freedom to worship as one chooses. We make room for as wide a variety of beliefs and creeds as the spiritual needs of man deem necessary. We sponsor an attitude on the part of government that shows no partiality to any one group and that lets each flourish according to the zeal of its adherents and the appeal of its dogma. When the state encourages religious instruction or cooperates with religious authorities by adjusting the schedule of public events to sectarian needs, it follows the best of our traditions. For it then respects the religious nature of our people and accommodates the public service to their spiritual needs. To hold that it may not would be to find in the Constitution a requirement that the government show a callous indifference to religious groups. That would be preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe. Government may not finance religious groups nor undertake religious instruction nor blend secular and sectarian education nor use secular institutions to force one or some religion on any person. But we find no constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion and to throw its weight against efforts to widen the effective scope of religious influence. The government must be neutral when it comes to competition between sects. It may not thrust any sect on any person. It may not make a religious observance compulsory. It may not coerce anyone to attend church, to observe a religious holiday, or to take religious instruction. But it can close its doors or suspend its operations as to those who want to repair to their religious sanctuary for worship or instruction. No more than that is undertaken here.
This program may be unwise and improvident from an educational or a community viewpoint. That appeal is made to us on a theory, previously advanced, that each case must be decided on the basis of “our own prepossessions.” See McCollum v. Board of Education, supra, p. 238. Our individual preferences, however, are not the constitutional standard. The constitutional standard is the separation of Church and State. The problem, like many problems in constitutional law, is one of degree. See McCollum v. Board of Education, supra, p. 231.
In the McCollum case the classrooms were used for religious instruction and the force of the public school was used to promote that instruction. Here, as we have said, the public schools do no more than accommodate their schedules to a program of outside religious instruction. We follow the McCollum case. But we cannot expand it to cover the present released time program unless separation of Church and State means that public institutions can make no adjustments of their schedules to accommodate the religious needs of the people. We cannot read into the Bill of Rights such a philosophy of hostility to religion.
Affirmed.
Why community funding?
The succession of states gives legal capacity to Cynthia Mildred Miles to stand in her own stead for her domestic and international relations, replacing her predecessor, the United States. You may read a copy of CES Succession Notification in 103 languages here.
Among other legal notices the Succession Notification also included a copy of Cynthia’s Will allowing CES to continue after her death. Initially, the Will named the United Nations Member States to inherit CES in equal shares. However after witnessing firsthand the extent of corruption, in 2017, Cynthia changed her Will.
The Will change was necessary because other than CES the United States appeared the only United Nations Member State to uphold their citizens’ rights for specific agreed human rights treaties. Treaties that each accepting Government acted as “Agent.” Not only for their peoples’ benefit but signing in place of the true contract principals.
The new Will names the individual States of the United States in equal shares. Every United States Governor was formally served a copy for their state in January of 2017.
BACKGROUND
Relevant International Law
Under United Nations Charter, Article 104, the United States Government does not have supreme authority over the United States. See Charter Article 104, “The Organization shall enjoy in the territory of each of its Members such legal capacity as may be necessary….” Territory here is not defined as physical land but government administration units. In the United States this includes federal, state and county governments. But not municipal.
If you doubt this is impacting us today realize that police departments are municipal, not county like sheriff departments. No one discussed defunding any other law enforcement agencies during the Covid pandemic. Some of which also hurt innocent people. Only the municipal police were targeted. Under United Nations Charter Article 104, ‘municipal’ police are the only law enforcement outside of United Nations control within the United States.
While Article 104 forces United Nations control over the United States all the way down through their state county levels the United Nations does not have supreme authority. People do. See United Nations Charter Preamble, “WE THE PEOPLES…through representatives assembled…do hereby establish an international organization to be known as the United Nations….” This firmly settles people as principals of the United Nations contract with the Organization as their agent. In other words the people (by their representatives) have ordained the United Nations to rule over their governments...as the ‘organization’ deems necessary.
Materially, ‘Agents’ Cannot Supersede Their Principals!
Recognizing treaty effects and knowing that ‘wards’ are ineligible to contract, Cynthia Mildred Miles proved her mental competence to stand in her own stead to the United States, California and the United Nations. Before 2008, the United Nations, United States, California and Cynthia were guardians and ward. Since then they’re agents and principal. In fact, her efforts to prove herself were so convincing, in Los Angeles Superior Court Case BP-125551 (opposing Bank of America by herself) the California court documented, recognized, certified and recorded her legal status as—accredited American sovereign (in other words, one of its ‘crowns’). This ‘sovereign’ designation is her governmentally recognized ‘legal status.’ It is in NO way related to any domestic terrorist group that uses the word ‘sovereign’ in their group name.
Under international law (that United States ratified) her recorded legal status is now irrevocable and unconditional no matter the situation. Her legal status can even easily be verified online by viewing the parties listed in Los Angeles Superior Court Case BP-125551. Notably, those with supreme authority have power to settle matters at will. United Nations, for example, is just an ‘agent’ and cannot do this on its own. Even global agents are still just agents. Agents cannot supersede their principals.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) forces surveillance on each member state. The IMF uses information gained from this spying and their forced balance-of-payments statistical reporting to control each member state’s monetary policy. See IMF Articles of Agreement, Article IV, § 3, ¶ (a), “The Fund shall oversee the international monetary system...and shall oversee the compliance of each member….” And Article IV, § 3, ¶ (b), “In order to fulfill its functions under (a) above, the Fund shall exercise firm surveillance…. Each member shall provide the Fund with the information necessary for such surveillance….” This means the United States does NOT control its own monetary policy!!
Individual people and corporations are the only entities free from this control. See IMF Articles of Agreement, Article VIII, § 5, ¶ (b), “Members shall be under no obligation to furnish information in such detail that the affairs of individuals or corporations are disclosed.” While state counties classify as government administration units, municipalities do not. For example, cities when incorporated are corporations. When not, they’re representations of ’people.’ This however is moot.
Even though local US communities (as exempt entities) are free from surveillance, each member states’ compulsory balance-of-payments statistical reporting (or forced spying) includes them. Yet money that a ‘migrant’ brings home IS exempt from statistical reporting. See IMF Balance of Payments Manual 6, Appendix 5, § E-1, ¶ A5.24, “However, assets that migrants bring with them on return are excluded from balance of payments transactions…. Rather, because the residence of the owner changes but not the ownership….”
See also United Nations ‘migrant’ definitions, “The term migrant can be understood as ‘any person who lives temporarily or permanently in a country where he or she was not born, and has acquired some significant social ties to this country. However, this may be a too narrow definition when considering that, according to some states’ policies, a person can be considered as a migrant even when s/he is born in the country….’”
While it’s true IMF controls financial monetary policy of United States, they do not have supreme authority. Like United Nations, IMF is only an agent. This places the supremacy of jurisdiction and authority—to people. For example, neither IMF nor United Nations can override Cynthia Mildred Miles’ authority and jurisdiction in relation to her, her money, her bank account or how she instructs her money to be cleared and settled by her agents. SHE has final say. In truth, formal court records prove it’s direct known material FACT that she has the ONLY say....except of course for Jesus.
See Revelation 1:5-6 KJV, “and from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, and hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.” See also John 9:33 KJV, “If this man were not of God, he could do nothing.”
HMCM CBOI banking infrastructure was deployed after all related authorities were duly noticed and those notices formally court recorded. Millies were issued and exchange agreements were lawfully secured. The resulting monetary supply can’t cause inflation because it has no associated debt.
To change the status quo...
People need to use their unalienable rights. Rights which even the “Preamble” of the United Nations Charter affirms.
“People” made the United Nations—not their Governments who only REPRESENTED them.
Local municipalities benefit!
While others use rules to harm you we use rules to help.
Our funding is simple. It’s based on International Monetary Fund rules for balance-of-payments statistical reporting. Money brought home by a migrant is exempt from all balance-of-payments international reporting and surveillance.The Landmark Surety of Peace Court Filing
After proving her mental competence to stand in her own stead to the United States, State of California, United Nations and its organizations, on November 7th, 2012, Cynthia Mildred Miles filed a ‘surety of peace’ in Ventura Superior Court Case 2011045129. It was court received and recorded the same day. Prior invoked universality principle was court recorded on October 12th, 2012. In her Surety of Peace Offer, Cynthia claimed her right to stand as the financial liable party for among others all contracts signed on her behalf by federal and state government. Possible because agents cannot supersede their principals. And the principal, not the agent, is the financially liable party.
More than 200 domestic and international recipients received formal court service of process. The court recorded a request for ‘Service Abroad of Judicial or Extrajudicial Documents’ on December 6th, 2012. The United States Government formally received and accepted her surety of peace offer on December 24th, 2012, which is court recorded.
Every United Nations member state also AGREED which court records prove. They also acquiesced to her qualification to do the same internationally by proxy for any contract signed on behalf of people due to the incontestable ‘unalienable-sovereignty’ of all peoples. Possible because it’s settled that ‘remedy’ is related to redress of injuries. When rights invaded and injuries committed are merely private, no one has a right to interfere or seek a remedy except the parties immediately injured and his professional advisers. But when the remedy is even nominally public and prosecuted in the name of the commonwealth anyone may institute proceedings, although not privately injured (1 Salk. 174; 1 Atk. 221; 8 M. & S. 71).
During the six-and-a-half-years entirety of this Ventura Superior Court Case 2011045129, there was a live ‘bench warrant’ for Cynthia Mildred Miles’ arrest. The warrant was related to driving on an alleged suspended California Driver License on December 23rd, 2011. No ticket was ever issued as the alleged incident could not have occurred because no such driver license even existed. At the time Cynthia didn’t have a California state issued driver license nor did she for more than a year and a half prior.
However, on December 23rd, 2011, Cynthia was kidnapped by police and taken somewhere with Sheriff deputies and what appeared Federal agents. Amongst other treatment she was chained and bound and forced down on urine-soaked cement execution style while a male officer instructed many other male officers to lay her face down, take off her pants and spread her legs. Cynthia described the ordeal as, ”It was surreal. Christ’s peace came upon me and I remember it was so weird because it smelled REALLY bad but I was so calm and completely at peace. And then without so much as a thought from my end (I think Jesus spoke for me), I told them I loved them. They just broke. One man was crying so hard I could hardly understand what he was saying. He told me, ‘Thank you.’ And that nobody had ever spoken to them like that, especially in a circumstance like this.”
It is suspected the United Nations forced the warrant and Cynthia’s ill-treatment. Cynthia never felt the USA/California officers/agents wanted to do that to her. Interestingly, her sovereign immunity court recorded in Los Angeles Superior Court Case BP-125551 since February 8th, 2011, held afterwards for the remaining six-and-a-half years. Both United States Government and California State Government upheld her immunity. No law enforcement ever touched her again in six-and-a-half years. Not even when she had several calendared court hearings in Case BP-125551 which court dockets prove. In fact, she was informed by former high-level CIA/NSA that high-level Department of Justice confirmed that when her name was run on law enforcement computers, the computer screen read only, “DO NOT TOUCH HER.”
Also, on November 7th, 2012, when Cynthia was at FedEx picking up the ‘surety’ paperwork to hand off to a retired police officer to file for her (because of the warrant); secret service agents approached her driver waiting outside in the car. They gave the driver a ‘nod’ then drove off. When Cynthia got back into the car and they got on the 405 freeway, their car was COMPLETELY surrounded by black SUV secret service vehicles, surrounded by many more police black-and-white vehicles, surrounded by more motorcycle police officers. They stayed with Cynthia the entire time until she handed off the paperwork that later became the landmark Ventura Superior Court Case 2011045129 Surety of Peace Offer court filing.
On December 8th, 2016, Cynthia formally gave official notification of succession of states and unsuspended the effects of 22-multilateral treaties for her estate. This too is court recorded in Ventura Superior Court Case 2011045129 with universality principle invoked and court recorded. Its notification was served to each United Nations member state and organization. And it was properly deposited in each respective 22-depositories as well as with the United States Office of Treaty Affairs.
The lack of contest and lack of objection to Cynthia’s central bank, currency and succession of states by all United Nations member states and organizations are also court recorded. The Surety of Peace and Notification of Succession of States court filings in Ventura Superior Court Case 2011045129 prove who knows what, for how long and that all who were process served—AGREED—without contest or objection. Her legal status recorded in Los Angeles Superior Court BP-125551 proves the supremacy of her legal standing, authority and jurisdiction. Which because it was court recorded, is forever irrevocable and unconditional.
Note the fixed international time frame to contest or object is only one year. It’s understood and agreed that those who do not bring contest during that time LOSE their capacity later. This landmark historic precedent California Court Case remained open for SIX AND A HALF years (with universality principal invoked and recorded) before formal court decision. The Ventura County Superior Court decided in Cynthia’s favor, ‘in the name of justice.’ No contest or objection was ever brought. Thus, everything she claimed in this case stands proved as NO ONE prosecuted her under 18 U.S. Code § 1001 {especially ¶¶ (a) 2 and 3} and C.P.C. § 118. The Federal and State codes for which she was never prosecuted. Not even in more than six and a half years! Since mid-2018, NO entity (not even worldwide) can bring ANY argument against the court recorded Surety of Peace, CES Succession of States or Cynthia’s ABSOLUTE sovereign legal status. ALL are now permanently incontestable.
See U.S.C. § 1001 (a) “Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully… (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry….”
Also note perjury under California Penal Code Section 118 PC is a felony offense that can carry prison sentences of up to four years. A simple background check will prove she has never been prosecuted for making false statements to federal or state government. Her full name is Cynthia Mildred Miles born in Arizona on June 10th, 1964. This proves both federal and state governments agree her statements made in all her court filings are true.
HMCM CBOI. We use “rules” to help!
Change Can Be Beautiful
HMCM Central Bank of Issue
Logic commands the realization that if we created the financial system, by contracted agreement, then we can fix it by the rules agreed upon. This is rational and sound. (All contracts MUST have remedy or they’re void on their face.) We realize that big change can be scary but it need not be. Change can be beautiful and at HMCM CBOI our sincere wish is to support you to your country’s potential. It is everyone’s unalienable right to aspire to goodness. In a world where the elite “strong” willingly choose to dominate the less fortunate Cynthia Mildred Miles turned her back on privilege to give it all away. To give is a natural right. It harms no one. As we support the potential in you…we cordially ask you to support the potential in her.
[Language translator toggle is at top of page.]
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE
ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency Exceptional Reservations are “CES” for ISO 3166-1 (alpha 3) and “CE” for (alpha 2); “HMCMCEMP” for ISO 9362:2009; and “∞” for both ISO/IEC 10646 and Unicode Symbol for the State Millie currency.
STATE SOVEREIGN WILL OF 4 JANUARY 2017
4 January 2017Let it be known by this Instrument of 4 January 2017 the Sovereign of the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE (“CES”) changes her previous Will as made known in pp. 45-46 of the “DIPLOMATIC NOTE TO THE UNITED NATIONS FAMILY NOTIFICATION OF SUCCESSION OF STATES” which satisfied Notification of Succession of States and or Accession (by CES initiative) with full powers on 8 December 2016 for 22 multilateral treaties.
Cynthia Mildred Miles wills her Estate which is CES to the individual States of the United States of America in equal shares on her death. She firmly revokes any previous wills and codicils. She wills her personal items excluded. Orders for disposal of her personal items are private. If her orders are missing at her death, Cynthia Mildred Miles wills her personal items privately disposed and not made public. She wills any surviving animals left in CES care throughout their lifetime and in familiar manner or higher.
Cynthia Mildred Miles appoints the Governors of the individual States of the United States of America as Co-Executors of her “Will” on her death. If they are unwilling or cannot she appoints the Treasuries of the individual States of the United States of America as Successor Co-Executors. Her Executors shall have all power to govern the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE (CES) on her death. The State warrants and bonds anything needed.
The State expressly approves any Executor to serve as Honorary Citizen/s on the CES Sovereign’s death. If they are unwilling or cannot, any Agent of United States of America Federal Government may serve in-kind. Diplomat status is not required. The State pre-approves any needs for endless support to the United States of America family including but not limited to their Federal, State, and Trust Territories as well as any or all allies if United States of America so chooses and in such manner as is acceptable to them or however decided by this Will’s named Co-Executors. These approvals attach and are part of Cynthia Mildred Miles’ “Will”.
IN SOLIDARITY AND IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have placed my sign-manual on this Instrument of “STATE SOVEREIGN WILL OF 4 JANUARY 2017” satisfying testimony and witness of change in Will with full powers at Miles Province on 4 January 2017 and permanently voiding Will dated 8 December 2016 immediately without further notice or delay.
Electronically affirmed here (again) on 15 November 2022 to serve same as wet-ink by HE HM Cynthia Mildred Miles, CES Head of State, Sovereign and Minister of Foreign Affairs. Veritas numquam perit!! [The truth never passes away.]
For more information visit https://MilesProvince.com.
HMCM CBOI Motto: The principal part of everything is the beginning.
Genesis 1:1-3 KJV — In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Deuteronomy 4:29-31 KJV — But if from thence thou shalt seek the LORD thy God, thou shalt find him, if thou seek him with all thy heart and with all thy soul. When thou art in tribulation, and all these things are come upon thee, even in the latter days, if thou turn to the LORD thy God, and shalt be obedient unto his voice; (For the LORD thy God is a merciful God;) he will not forsake thee, neither destroy thee, nor forget the covenant of thy fathers which he sware unto them.
2 Chronicles 15:3-4 KJV — Now for a long season Israel hath been without the true God, and without a teaching priest, and without law. But when they in their trouble did turn unto the LORD God of Israel, and sought him, he was found of them.
John 17:1-5 KJV — These words spake Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee: As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him. And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do. And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was.
John 1:1-5 KJV — In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
Luke 8:11-12 KJV — Now the parable is this: The seed is the word of God. Those by the way side are they that hear; then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be saved.
Revelation 19:11-13 KJV — And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
Revelation 22:12-17 KJV — And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city. For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie. I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.