IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE!! Among other legal notices the below Succession Notification gave HM Cynthia Mildred Miles’ Will allowing CES to continue after her death. Initially, the Will named the United Nations Member States to inherit CES in equal shares. However after witnessing firsthand the extent of corruption on 4 January 2017 Cynthia Mildred Miles changed her Will. The new Will names the individual States of the United States in equal shares. Every United States Governor received a copy for their state in January of 2017. You may download a copy of the ONLY valid Will by CLICKING HERE. Or you may also read her new Will in any language online here.
John 5:19-47 KJV — Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise. For the Father loveth the Son, and sheweth him all things that himself doeth: and he will shew him greater works than these, that ye may marvel. For as the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom he will. For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God: and they that hear shall live. For as the Father hath life in himself; so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself; And hath given him authority to execute judgment also, because he is the Son of man. Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation. I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me. If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. There is another that beareth witness of me; and I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true. Ye sent unto John, and he bare witness unto the truth. But I receive not testimony from man: but these things I say, that ye might be saved. He was a burning and a shining light: and ye were willing for a season to rejoice in his light. But I have greater witness than that of John: for the works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me, that the Father hath sent me. And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape. And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not. Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me. And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life. I receive not honour from men. But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you. I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only? Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
John 14:12-14 KJV — Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father. And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE
CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE
ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency Exceptional Reservations are “CES” for ISO 3166-1 (alpha 3) and “CE” for (alpha 2); “HMCMCEMP” for ISO 9362:2009; and “the infinity sign” for both ISO/IEC 10646 and Unicode Symbol for the State Millie currency.
DIPLOMATIC NOTE TO THE UNITED NATIONS [1] FAMILY [2]
NOTIFICATION OF SUCCESSION OF STATES [3]
The Head of State of the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE [4] presents the State [5] to the United Nations. The State comes in peace with goodwill. [6]
PREAMBLE
OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT UNDER SEAL WITH FULL POWERS
8 December 2016
Let it be known by this Instrument of 8 December 2016 the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE [7] for its own specific territory replaces its Predecessor the United States of America. [8] As Successor State the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is solely responsible for its territory and international relations. [9]
DECLARATION
The State approves all treaties accepted on its behalf by its Predecessor. [10] Unless otherwise made known the State does not accept Predecessor reservations. [11] Treaty consent is universal and all-inclusive. All treaties continue in force [12] suspended [13] for the State territory unless provisionally applied. Treaties unsuspend with specific notifications of succession. Following are treaties unsuspending with this Notification now as well as treaties approved by the State by its own initiative entering force as agreed. See Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties of 23 August 1978—Articles 10, 17, 18 and 19.
The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE having considered the following 22 treaties: (1) succeeds to those listed below previously accepted on its behalf by its Predecessor; and (2) accedes to the others listed below by its own initiative. The State undertakes faithfully to perform and carry out all stipulations contained and approves these 22 treaties. The State deposited this Instrument (originals with physical State Seals) with each Depositary at the addresses listed. Because of threats against the State Sovereign the State also delivered extra originals with physical Seals to each United Nations Office in Geneva, Nairobi and Vienna to assure Notification receipt. United Nations Headquarters and all three United Nations Offices each received three State Flags. The 22 treaties are:
1. Succession: Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States of 26 December 1934
a. Notification deposited with Depositary Luis Almagro Lemes, Secretary-General, Organization of American States, General Secretariat Building, 1889 F Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006.
2. Accession: International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid of 30 November 1973
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
3. Succession: Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment of 10 December 1984
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
4. Accession: International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 16 December 1966
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
5. Succession: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
6. Accession: Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women of 18 December 1979
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
7. Accession: Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties of 23 August 1978
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
8. Accession: Convention on Succession of States in Respect of State Property, Archives and Debts of 8 April 1983
a. RESERVATIONS attach. [14]
b. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
9. Accession: Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations of 21 March 1986
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
10. Succession: Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations of 13 February 1946
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
11. Succession: Charter of the United Nations of 26 June 1945
a. DECLARATION OF OBLIGATION ACCEPTANCE attaches. [15]
b. DECLARATION OF Recognition of International Court of Justice attaches. [16]
c. STATE FLAGS attach. The State mailed its State Flags (made to United Nations {outdoor} 4-foot by 6-foot specifications) to the following United Nations Headquarters and United Nations Offices: (each received 3 Flags)
i. HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017
ii. Michael Møller, Director General, United Nations Office At Geneva (UNOG), Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
iii. Mr. Yury Fedotov, Director General, United Nations Office at Vienna (UNOV), Vienna International Centre, Wagramer Strasse 5, 1400 Vienna, Austria
iv. Ms. Sahle-Work Zewde, Director General, United Nations Office at Nairobi (UNON), P. O. Box 67578, Nairobi, Kenya 00200
d. DECLARATION OF MISSIONS TO THE UNITED NATIONS attaches . [17]
e. REQUEST FOR DIPLOMATIC PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES attaches. [18]
i. The State formally asks for honest communication about procedural paperwork. The State made best effort to provide everything needed. If something is missing please tell.
f. LETTER TO PRESENT CREDENTIALS attaches. [19]
i. The State delivered United Nations Membership of Main Committees of the General Assembly Form “A/INF/70/2” to the Credentials Committee before their meeting on 12 December 2016 [see afternoon item 3 (b)].
ii. The State delivered Form “A/INF/70/2” by courier, fax and or e-mail to assure timely receipt. The State included a copy of this Notification with each. The State delivered originals and or copies to:
1. United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
2. Protocol and Liaison Service Chief of Protocol
3. Credentials Committee Secretary Mr. Stadler Trengove
4. Credentials Committee Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs and United Nations Legal Counsel Mr. Miguel de Serpa Soares
5. Secretary of the First Committee Ms. Sonia Elliott
6. Secretary of the Special Political and Decolonization Committee (Fourth Committee) Ms. Christa Giles
7. Secretary of the Second Committee Ms. Emer Herity
8. Secretary of the Third Committee Mr. Moncef Khane
9. Secretary of the Fifth Committee Ms. Sharon Van Buerle
10. Secretary of the Sixth Committee Mr. Huw Llewellyn
iii. The State formally asks for honest communication about procedural paperwork. The State made best effort to provide everything needed. If something is missing please tell.
g. Notification deposited with:
i. (1) Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017; and
ii. (2) By the Charter’s Articles 110 and 111, Notification also deposited with Depositary United States of America Government, Office of Treaty Affairs, Attention: Charter of the United Nations Depositary, United States Department of State, 2201 C Street, N.W., L/T Room 5420, Washington, D.C, 20520. [20]
h. The State highlights Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations of 21 March 1986, Article 27 Internal law of States, rules of international organizations and observance of treaties — ¶ 2. “An international organization party to a treaty may not invoke the rules of the organization as justification for its failure to perform the treaty...”
12. Accession: Revised General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes of 28 April 1949
a. DECLARATION ABOUT PROVISIONS attaches. [21]
b. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
13. Succession: Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
14. Succession: Convention on the Political Rights of Women of 31 March 1953
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
15. Succession: Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 9 December 1948
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
16. Succession: International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 7 March 1966
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
17. Accession: Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character of 14 March 1975
a. RESERVATIONS attach. [22]
b. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
18. Accession: Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies of 21 November 1947
a. DECLARATION OF APPLICATION attaches. [23]
b. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
19. Succession: Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund of 27 December 1945
a. DECLARATIONS OF ACCEPTANCE AND CALL TO TRANSMIT SUBSCRIPTION FUNDS attach. [24]
b. DECLARATION OF INSTRUMENT SETTING FORTH PARTICIPATION IN SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS DEPARTMENT attaches. [25]
c. Notification deposited with:
i. (1) IMF Managing Director Ms. Christine Lagarde, International Monetary Fund, 700 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20431.
ii. (2) By Article 31, § 2, ¶ (a), Notification also deposited with Depositary Government of the United States of America, Office of Treaty Affairs, Attention: IMF Depositary, United States Department of State, 2201 C Street, N.W., L/T Room 5420, Washington, D.C, 20520. [26]
iii. (3) The State mailed Notification copy to Special Representative of the International Monetary Fund to the United Nations Mr. Axel Bertuch-Samuels, One Dag Hammarskjöld Plaza, 885 Second Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10017.
d. Instrument Setting Forth Participation in Special Drawing Rights Department deposited with:
i. (1) IMF Managing Director Ms. Christine Lagarde, International Monetary Fund, 700 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20431.
ii. (2) The State mailed Notification copy to Special Representative of the International Monetary Fund to the United Nations Mr. Axel Bertuch-Samuels, One Dag Hammarskjöld Plaza, 885 Second Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10017.
e. The State stresses Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations of 21 March 1986, Article 27 Internal law of States, rules of international organizations and observance of treaties — ¶ 2. “An international organization party to a treaty may not invoke the rules of the organization as justification for its failure to perform the treaty...”
20. Accession: Convention on special missions of 8 December 1969
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
21. Succession: Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 24 April 1963
a. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
22. Succession: Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 18 April 1961
a. RESERVATIONS attach. [27]
b. Notification deposited with Depositary HE Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General, United Nations Secretariat, United Nations, 405 East 42nd Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.
The State will cure any defect of deposit. It would appreciate any help offered to that end.
The State consents to consider itself active Party to more treaties in sensible time. It will deposit notifications when ready. Until then the State would like to contribute financially to help fulfil the Paris Agreement of 12 December 2015.
THUS
The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE comes now [28] internationally [29] in its own stead [30] to make its official appearance. The State acts for itself intending to contribute to the United Nations family. It is a neutral State. [31]
International law guarantees everyone’s right to change nationality. [32] Accredited Sovereign HM Cynthia Mildred Miles gave Renunciation of Nationality. The Predecessor accepted, certified and court recorded this change. [33]
The State stresses eight Articles from the Nationality of Natural Persons in relation to the Succession of States of 1999 annexed to General Assembly resolution 55/153 of 12 December 2000. These Articles are:
1. Article 5 —Presumption of nationality
2. Article 11 —Respect for the will of persons concerned, § (1) “States concerned shall give consideration to the will of persons concerned…”
3. Article 15 —Non-discrimination, “States concerned shall not deny persons concerned the right to retain or acquire a nationality or the right of option upon the succession of States by discriminating on any ground.” (emphasis added)
4. Article 16 —Prohibition of arbitrary decisions concerning nationality issues
5. Article 19 —Other States, § (2)
6. Article 20 —Attribution of the nationality of the successor State and withdrawal of the nationality of the predecessor State
7. Article 24 —Attribution of the nationality of the successor State, § (a)
8. Article 25 —Withdrawal of the nationality of the predecessor State, § (1)
HE HM Cynthia Mildred Miles exercises her rights to the fullest extent with finality. She completes this change in her nationality FOREVER from the Predecessor nationality to the Successor nationality. Member States contractually agreed to respect fully HM Cynthia Mildred Miles’ nationality affected by this Succession of States and her human rights and fundamental freedoms. [34] International law guarantees their effect. [35]
The territory of the Successor [36] who is the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE includes everything related to the estate [37] created at its Sovereign’s birth. The certified record is birth number 102-64-015050 of 10 June 1964, Maricopa, Arizona. Cynthia mildred miles [38] is the sole Grantor [39] of record. [40] She is the State Sovereign. The State population is boldly permanent. It includes the Sovereign who is without husband and children.
The State also allows for either General Assembly Delegates or World Bank Group and International Monetary Fund (here “IMF”) Representatives as Honorary Citizens but only after the State Sovereign’s death (see Sovereign’s “Will” herein pp. 45-46).
The State is autonomous. Its main export is Millie currency. Millies as gifts for balance-of-payments become international sales of exports, specifically “goods”. Gifting funding to the United Nations will create wealth universally as recipients of funding will cause increased sales of “services”. [42] Reserve positions and repurchasing of Millies from IMF holdings won’t be an issue. Millies must sell as they’re used leaving State holdings of Special Drawing Rights free for exchange into other Member’s currencies for State needs. Strengthening local economies and businesses will improve financial equilibrium worldwide. This in turn allows the State to self-fund the more it gives. [43] The State points out it is the only nation worldwide where 100 % of its population are bound as diplomats forcing no commercial profiting.
The Government of the United States of America accredited the Sovereign of the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE and court recognized her. [44] The official date of entry to her duties is 20 August 2006. The State uses 14 March 2008 as its official Succession date. This date accords with the certified date of recorded recognition by its Predecessor.
The State Government consists of the State Sovereign and Miles Province. The State Sovereign officially acts as the State Central Bank. The Sovereign also heads all executive roles. Miles Province performs as administrative divisions of the State and administrates among other capacities the State Treasury. Miles Province has several departments, offices and bureaux. Miles Province General-Post Office has been actively receiving international mail since 14 March 2011. This occurred by private international treaty with United States of America further confirming their express recognition. It also proves tacit recognition by several United Nation Member States (and California) as well as international relations with several United Nation Member States. Proof follows. Notice the State reserved ISO country codes are in use internationally (see mail from France).
See photo on Notification PDF page 39.
See photo on Notification PDF page 39.
Above is from Norway Justis-og Politidepartementet (Ministry of Justice and Police).
See photo on Notification PDF page 40.
Above sent from France.
See photo on Notification PDF page 40.
See photo on Notification PDF page 41.
Republic of Korea National Court Administration
Greece Ministry of Justice, Transparency & Human Rights
See photo on Notification PDF page 41.
The State guarantees United Nations legal capacity in its territory plus staff positions if wanted for exercise of Organization roles. This guarantee extends to each State Department, Office and Bureau to guarantee fulfiling United Nations purpose. [45] The State guarantees all privileges and immunities necessary. [46]
The State currency is the Millie. To promote stability it's on par with and pegged to IMF Special Drawing Right. This peg will change only if asked by the Fund. The State created the Millie without need of public use. It’s fully convertible and exchangeable for freely usable currencies but without need of public transaction. Exclusive specifics of State territory and population make this uniquely possible. Change will occur only if asked by the Fund.
The State guarantees IMF space within all State Missions and Embassies to house IMF agency and branch offices. This guarantee extends to all needs for IMF work and fulfilment of purpose. [47] The State guarantees the IMF surveillance access and promises to accept exchange rate policy guidance to secure State compliance and contract fulfilment. [48] The State guarantees all privileges and immunities necessary. [49]
The Declaration on Measures to Eliminate International Terrorism [50] asked States to make a formal inspection of international rules on prevention, repression and elimination of terrorism. Financing of terrorism in the international community is an important concern which the State is distinctly aware. Acts of international terrorism depend on financing.
The General Assembly asked all Member States to take steps domestically to neutralize and stop terrorist financing through organizations. [51] This call especially applied to financing for (or “claiming” for) charitable, social or cultural goals. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE responded. The State adopted regulatory measures specifically aimed at opposing movements of funds intended for terrorist purposes.
The State made key changes to its monetary policy. [52] The Central Bank recalled all bank bills which are now void. Stricter rules govern new issues. Added security features make printed forgeries impossible. To avoid lack of equilibrium, the Millie is on par with and pegged to the Special Drawing Right. The Central Bank applied IMF rules to all internal law. Unless asked by the IMF the Millie will never see public exchange.
Realizing urgent need to block terrorist financing the State approved financial and technical services performed by the Fund as spelled out in its Agreement under Article 5, § 2, ¶ (b). This creates ideal exchange of information on State movement of funds while also supporting international freedom of legitimate capital movement. [53]
The State appointed a separate financial institution to hold IMF holdings of Millies though the State is also able to perform this role. The appointed Depository can issue notes or similar instruments for face value payment on such IMF account as substitution for currency in the General Resources Account. [54] The State Central Bank also has this ability and is willing for any combination or choice acceptable to the IMF. [55] State ability to perform all IMF, Fund and Special Drawing Rights Department participation and duties has been in effect since 27 July 2012.
As the United Nations is aware the financing needs for global sustainable development are massive. The estimates unfailingly point to a huge shortage. Transformative change is necessary. To destroy poverty and hunger, it's necessary. To achieve economic growth for all, it's necessary. To protect the environment, ensure peace, globally realize our shared human rights goals—it is decisive.
Our past behaviour will not deliver the sustainable development we seek. It’s no longer humane. It's not inclusive. It doesn’t integrate human rights for all.
It's not sane to think added creditor loans will help. It's not sane thinking consuming more stuff we don’t need will make tomorrow better. It's especially illogical to think destroying our earth’s forests will make our world better.
The only way to resolve debt and prevent crisis is by using our human rights. The United Nations successfully protected human rights. It's time we use them.
All nation states have the role of political state exercising governmental duties on the international stage of actors. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is unique. The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 18 April 1961 binds the entire State population. One-hundred per cent of its people have to be “received” as a diplomatic agent by another Nation. This outlaws profit. State people must act solely in social-interest. Treaty law forces this. [56]
The Predecessor represented the State at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference of 1944 fixing the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE as Original Member of the IMF. [57] The State can carry itself and its people without self-related bias. The IMF Agreement assures this. [58]
The State Millie pegged to IMF Special Drawing Right is important. With this peg the State can fund the entire United Nations without negatively swinging the markets. Exchanged through IMF and dealt out in coordination with the Economic Social Council massive issuances of Millie currency will only devalue itself. Competitive exchange depreciation effects are avoidable because international law forbids the State to act commercially. The State and its people will remain unharmed because of what’s allowed under Article 30 of the IMF Agreement.
If the IMF agrees to perform financial and technical services as spelled out in its Agreement under Article 5, § 2(b), the IMF can manage all State gifts to the United Nations family. [59] Without risk of one-sided control in use of funds balanced opportunity that includes all is possible.
Members can benefit from increased funding without risk because of already set up IMF safeguards. This also gives greater ability for maladjustment corrections without destructive measures that normally harm international prosperity. Possible effects on international trade, employment levels and greater development of materials used to produce goods and services can benefit all Member State’s people safely. [60] The State and its Sovereign cannot affect trade. There cannot be special interest profiting. It's peaceful. There’s no harmful result. Universal just funding can occur.
The Predecessor represented the State at the United Nations Conference on International Organization at San Francisco. This fixed the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE as Original Member of the United Nations on deposit of this Notification of Succession of States. [61] Well proved in law is the principle that principals are financially liable for their agents. State Gifts only reflect this renown merit of law.
The State can host the IMF Principal Office or pay for its current. [62] The State will adapt for IMF works, purpose and security of staff. The State also makes known its commitment to gift funding for full costs for all specialized agencies as well as the entire United Nations Organization. This is all-encompassing and includes among other needs all buildings now and in the future. For example the General Assembly may want more locations with live streaming abilities allowing easier attendance for all and less load on receiving States. The State will gift any cost and adjust for all needs or wants. The State waives any extra voting rights for larger contributions where this possibility exists (such as quota-based votes). [63] The State does not seek unequalled power.
Protecting our capacity to regulate in public interest lines up with human rights. Humanity’s ability to protect gender equality, labour issues, the earth, rights of children, and social and disability support services (with infrastructure) are not extras but essential.
We have agreed under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969 that our internal laws will not justify our failure to perform! This Convention’s Article 27 proves this. Therefore we have to perform among others the following:
1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948
2. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 16 December 1966
3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966
While it’s true when invaded rights and committed injuries are private no one except the injured and their advisers has a right to interfere; it's also true when the injury is public anyone can intervene. People are the original authors of law. So when others act by our authority and we stand by and allow them to act in our name it's our authority that’s presumed. We’re the ones bound by those acts and if human rights aren’t being upheld—WE—as a species are liable! Conscience is Nature’s justice and it compels us to act even when binding duty has failed us.
The World Conference on Human Rights asked the international community to help relieve debt of developing countries. The Conference asked us, as United Nations Member States, to help relieve debt for economic, social and cultural rights of people. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE heard this call.
[The next few paragraphs are not part of the original Notification text. Among other legal notices this Succession Notification gave HM Cynthia Mildred Miles’ Will allowing CES to continue after her death. Initially, the now CANCELLED AND REPLACED Will named the United Nations Member States to inherit CES in equal shares. However, on 4 January 2017 Cynthia Mildred Miles changed her Will after witnessing firsthand the extent of corruption. The new Will names the individual States of the United States in equal shares. Every United States Governor received a copy for their state in January of 2017. You may download a copy of the ONLY valid Will by CLICKING HERE. Or you may also read her new Will in any language online here.
So there can be NO misinterpretation of Cynthia’s intent for her last will and testament, specifics of the CANCELLED AND REPLACED Cynthia Mildred Miles Will (included in the original Succession Notification) are here replaced by the following bolded text:
Cynthia Mildred Miles wills her Estate which is CES to the individual States of the United States of America in equal shares on her death. She firmly revokes any previous wills and codicils. She wills her personal items excluded. Orders for disposal of her personal items are private. If her orders are missing at her death, Cynthia Mildred Miles wills her personal items privately disposed and not made public. She wills any surviving animals left in CES care throughout their lifetime and in familiar manner or higher.
Cynthia Mildred Miles appoints the Governors of the individual States of the United States of America as Co-Executors of her “Will” on her death. If they are unwilling or cannot she appoints the Treasuries of the individual States of the United States of America as Successor Co-Executors. Her Executors shall have all power to govern the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE (CES) on her death. The State warrants and bonds anything needed.
The State expressly approves any Executor to serve as Honorary Citizen/s on the CES Sovereign’s death. If they are unwilling or cannot, any Agent of United States of America Federal Government may serve in-kind. Diplomat status is not required. The State pre-approves any needs for endless support to the United States of America family including but not limited to their Federal, State, and Trust Territories as well as any or all allies if United States of America so chooses and in such manner as is acceptable to them or however decided by this Will’s named Co-Executors. These approvals attach and are part of Cynthia Mildred Miles’ “Will”.
[Please see new Will dated 4 January 2017 here for current specifics related to Cynthia Mildred Miles’ ONLY VALID Will. Or download official copy with signature here. Please kindly see downloadable PDF copy of original CES Notification of Succession of States if interested in the original text necessarily removed from this web page. Thank you for your understanding. The original Succession Notification text continues from this point forward.]
Obviously, a man or woman governing himself or herself or people in combination don’t automatically form a nation state. To form a “nation state” the person must meet certain standards:
Terrorists and other self-motivated people may claim they govern themselves but quasi-self-interested “Administration” does not bring about nation state status. Nation states are liable for rights and duties. Being a nation state involves respect for the self-determinism of other nation states and of their people. Nation states are responsible with their acts and actions because they know they affect the global community as well as their own. Sociopaths don’t feel they’re responsible to others in this way.
A nation state is a moral person who acts in social-interest and is respectful of other legitimate Governments and their people. [64]
The Charter of the United Nations, Article 8 is (emphasis added): “The United Nations shall place no restrictions on the eligibility of men and women to participate in any capacity and under conditions of equality in its principal and subsidiary organs.” [65]
The General Assembly agreed all States are equal regardless of their territory scope or population. See United Nations document A/CN.4/2 of 15 December 1948: “The States are equal, whatever may be the extent of their territory or the importance of their population”.
The wills of the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE (guided eternally by its Grantor’s “Will”) and its Sovereign (guided consciously and conscientiously) are inimitable. These wills are distinctive only to themselves. The State is moral. Its acts and actions intentionally, consciously and willfully support other legitimate and peace-loving Governments and it stands in social-interest for the benefit of all. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is a nation State. [66]
The State Predecessor, under Seal, officially transferred the title (for specific State territory) back to the State. [67] International law permanently recognizes the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE as Successor State (of United States of America) to its own State territory.
Political existence doesn’t need recognition. However if a State does become recognized it's unconditional and irrevocable. The Predecessor undeniably accepted its Successor personality. [68] The United States of America decided. [69] Their decision is absolute. International law recognizes the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE as Sovereign Nation State. It's final. [70]
The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is the only person qualified to contract for its territory. [71] The Predecessor court recorded the legal status of the Head of State as “Accredited Sovereign American” proving current State position with all treaties previously signed on its behalf. [72] The State is ready for international relations. Proof is this communication. State international relations have been performing for several years without contest or objection. [73]
The State presented to United States of America its Request for Exequatur and forms DS-2003, I-566, I-539, DS-1972 for 30 different Government capacities, and returned its Predecessor issued Passport to the Predecessor. The Head of State issued credentials for HE HM Cynthia Mildred Miles as State Representative for all General Assembly Committees for the seventy-first session. The State delivered to the United Nations Secretary-General, Secretary of the Credentials Committee, and Protocol and Liaison Service the following before 12 December 2016:
The Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties 23 August 1978 governs transfers of treaty duties and rights from predecessors to successors. This applies for succession of states occurring after this Convention’s entry into force on 6 November 1996. [74] The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE official Succession date is after this date. It’s 14 March 2008.
This same Vienna Convention also governs transfers for treaties forming international organizations and their adopted treaties such as the Charter of the United Nations, its Adoptions, Specialized Agencies and other Intergovernmental Organizations. This includes among others the IMF. It does not include unwritten treaties.
International law considers the State a Contracting State to all treaties and international organizations approved by the United States of America before 14 March 2008. The State may consider itself already a Party to all of them including among others the United Nations. [75] The only exclusions are those needing “one-hundred per cent” Party consent. [76]
This is because all treaties conform to human rights. [77] Notably there is no treaty with a purpose against peoples’ right to self-determinism. Decidedly there is no Intergovernmental Organization with a purpose against its own funding.
Treaty suspensions between the State and other Parties end with Notification. [78] This Diplomatic Note serves in-kind. [79] All necessary Parties received written communication. The rights and duties for 22 treaties now perform as agreed. Some pass by State Succession to the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE. The rest by State initiative entering force as agreed.
The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969 confirms treaty Parties internal law cannot justify any failure to perform. International law recognizes the State is already a contracted Party to every written multilateral treaty accepted by United States of America before 14 March 2008. The Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States of 26 December 1934 forces this recognition as irrevocable and unconditional. The Contracting Parties bound themselves as agreed to this. This is impossible to deny, dispute or disprove. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is a qualified person of international law and now officially appears before you!
The State National Colours are CES-Aqua, white and CES-Purple. The State Bureau of International Standardization Compliance assigned Pantone 319-C and Pantone 2597-C to represent the National Colours across all substrates.
The National Flag consists of three equal width horizontal bars. The bar colours top to bottom are CES-Aqua, white and CES-Purple. The bars honour all United Nations Member States especially the State Predecessor who working for peace together set humanity’s bars of conscience. Their Ancestors and current Agents preserved and protected CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE rights.
The bars’ order represents justice and sovereignty shall obey and uphold peace; peace exists by upholding truth, solidarity, rights to self-determinism and hope. Together they stand for setting bars of conscience against war, special interest and greed. Conscience represented by CES-Aqua leads them.
See photo on Notification PDF page 58.
Only sanctioned Government may fly the CES-Official-Flag whose size is 2:1. There is a CES-Peoples-Flag which anyone may fly. Different only in its size it’s 3:5. The State also has CES-United-Nations-Size-Flags in 4:6. The State provided official CES-United-Nations-Size-Flags to the United Nations Headquarters as well as their Offices in Geneva, Nairobi and Vienna.
The Miles Province Provincial Flag uses the National Colours. The MP-Official-Flag is 2:1. Only official Government may fly the MP-Official-Flag. The MP-Peoples-Flag is 3:5; anyone may fly this flag. The Miles Province Provincial Flag has two CES-Aqua barrulets placed horizontally across top and bottom. There is a wide single white fesse across the centre. The white fesse represents peace. Across the white fesse written with Niagara Engraved Font in CES-Purple is the State Motto: “Until no one suffers from poverty; WE have not solved our own poverty.” The Provincial Flag signals Miles Province acts for the well-being of all.
See photo on Notification PDF page 59.
The Niagara Engraved Font has its own symbolism. The word is aboriginal in origin. Native peoples occupied the Niagara peninsula in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The French referred to these people as “La Nation Neutre” because of their refusal to become involved in continuing hostilities. There are two accepted meanings for “Niagara”. They stem from “onyara” a Mohawk word for neck connecting head and body (Lake Erie and Lake Ontario) and “onguiaahra” an Iroquois word for thunderer of waters who echoes with great noise. By 1652 the Neutral Indians Nation no longer existed. Their language died with the last of their people leaving no one to grace us with the meaning. (Coincidentally the Sovereign is French and American Indian.)
Some also say Niagara is a word for anything powerful. The State combines all three views on etymology. It uses “thunderer of waters resounding with great noise” and “the neck connecting the head and the body”. Intended State symbolic meaning of this font choice is, “Miles Province—a powerful thunderer, with mind and heart connected, transcends international boundaries resounding peace and neutrality with great noise!” While art’s meaning is often best left to its observers, perhaps like water unexpectedly able to carve new paths out of stone, the final meaning we’ll forge together.
The State Great Seal seen at the top of this page uses the purposed International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard for the Millie currency (infinity-sign). It's centred across a white diamond with a black compound-outline. Surrounding the diamond is the State name. The font is “SWGamekeys MT”.
The Millie currency-standard in the State Seal’s centre represents that which is eternal, the spark of life and zero-point energy. The intended meaning is limitless possibility is the core. The single white diamond represents unity, peace and wealth given in love.
The compound-outline of the diamond represents duality as it creates two different looks representing two paths we can choose. One look appears as six diamonds stacked on themselves alternating black and white. The other appears as five separate outlines surrounding a single white diamond. The look of six diamonds represents the fall of humans by our own co-created contracts fixing the value of money to our own undoing. This is the limit we imposed on ourselves. The look of five outlines embracing a single white diamond represents financial redemption guaranteed by the sanctity of our human rights. Original rights graced on us as birthrights are up to us to use. Our original Benefactor recognizes “pacta sunt servanda” (agreements must be kept) but if we want to realize our human potential it’s up to us to accept Nature’s contractual offer.
The letters come together while keeping their individuality symbolizing the unalienable sovereignty of all earth’s people. Individually all are equal. All are original authors of corporal law. The letters form one circle. Combined (25, 2+5=7) they represent perfection and enlightened mind. They represent the “game” of life (individuality) and "keys" (coming together in solidarity) to unlock limitless potential.
The Seal’s simplicity stands for social-interest prevailing over self-interest.
The elm tree is the State National Tree. The intended meaning is ethical, legal and political dignity. The National Tree signals this truth: “Every living being has an innate right to be valued and receive ethical treatment.” Elms also mean life in its “idyllic” form and their shade a place of peace.
The edelweiss flower is the State National Flower. The intended meaning is daring and noble courage, purity and the immortality of inherent essence. It signals hope and joy. The flower’s scientific name (in English “lion’s paw”) also means rising to higher spiritual understanding enables one to become better.
Difficulty in getting this flower is proof of an unusual daring. Its receipt as a gift means its giver risked a great deal to show you their affection for you. The National Flower expresses the State Sovereign's courage, heart, spirit, her love of all peoples and what she hopes to contribute.
The State has two heraldic supporters. The State assigned the Point of Honour to a Reindeer representing peace, harmony and one who will not fight unless provoked. This supporter’s partner is the State Goat who wins through politics and diplomacy rather than war. Other State mobile-charges and their intended meanings are:
o Geranium—true friendship
o Peony—healing
o Snapdragon (in honour of the State Sovereign born in a Year of the Wood Dragon)—graciousness and strength
The State doesn’t keep a military. There is no wish to raise sword against anyone. There is no need among allies. Instead the State keeps a Department of Safety and Peacekeeping. Its purpose is to provide for United Nations peacekeeping. Its motto is, “Power is not conferred, but for everyone’s good.” The State Department of Safety and Peacekeeping approved heraldic charges and their intended meanings are:
All Administrative Divisions of State have heraldic charges and mottos. The Government agencies currently with approved standards and mottos are:
o “Until no one suffers from poverty; WE have not solved our own poverty.”
The State Sovereign has her own motto, standard, supporter and charge. The Sovereign’s Motto is, “I maintain my right to love all equally.” The Sovereign’s Standard uses the centre of the Great Seal in its middle but in the National Colours. The background is CES-Purple. Its size is 1:1. No one except HE HM Cynthia Mildred Miles may fly her Official Standard.
See photo on Notification PDF page 65.
The Sovereign’s Supporter is an Otter bearing a (symbolic) Millie Coin. The intended meaning is one who lives life to the fullest and who is worthy of trust with its Treasury. The Sovereign’s Charge is a Chough bearing an olive branch and a garb bound by a CES-Aqua ribbon. The intended meaning is:
o Fights for its friends
o Upholds Nature’s Law
o Comes in peace
o Brings harvest and hope for all
o Is secured by Conscience
See photo on Notification PDF page 66.
(Drawing purposed—not confirmed.)
The State asserts a true strategist in battle watches over friends, seeks divine providence for peace and cooperates with others to find mutual agreement.
Outside-the-box thinking about our future focused on what “could be” instead of just “what is” will secure the greatest return for our hopes. The State will make known the other State Heraldic Symbols later.
The State created a unique Title for its Sovereign. There is no doubt it's intended original. While her full-style is “Her Messiah Cynthia Mildred Miles of Absolute Sovereign Domain” religion has nothing to do with it. The State wanted to show diplomacy while preserving its incomparable originality. Thus it specifically chose words having “H” and “M” abbreviations to comply with known international standards.
The (disused) traditional “Her Majesty” means “Her God”. The State Sovereign is not religious but scientific. The etymology of the word “Messiah” reflects a tradition of anointing new sovereigns with oil when they succeeded a predecessor’s throne. Its original context made this word a logical choice. The State intends “Her Messiah” to symbolize “the Sovereign is her own liberator” …she transformed herself to be the change she wanted to see. The State intends “Absolute Sovereign Domain” to mean “jurisdiction and authority for her territory are exclusively hers”.
The State National Holidays are:
Our past has shown the 2008 financial crisis prompted worldwide financial governance to improve. IMF lending-resources increased four-hundred per cent. However funding problems remain despite regulatory reform and new emergency financing. When liquidity crisis occurs we can’t immediately fund large amounts. Thus the State gifts its Millie currency to benefit the United Nations family eternally.
The United Nations family only benefits from receiving funding as gifts. If all countries have what they need we can strengthen cooperation and support for technology, science, skill training and knowledge-sharing. It will strengthen our capacity to work together. Nurturing, developing and adapting key technologies benefits the whole world. It enables us to protect our planet. Everyone wins.
We need more innovation and clean technology funding to meet the post-2015 development agenda. The State gifts all funding to address climate change, biodiversity loss and protection of our ecosystem. The State wants nothing in return.
We need unbiased funding to end poverty, ensure health and advance education through higher-level schooling. Unbiased funding can also aid sidelined groups and gender equality in ways self-interested investment cannot. To take care of the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable properly we need social-interest funding. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE gifts this.
Public finance is critical for all of us. However countries that cannot raise their own as well as countries emerging from conflict have greater needs. The entire United Nations needs in-house funding. With it Governments can effectively help their people. Unethical corporate tax dodging—ends. Lawful companies can have the necessary environments they need to flourish. Special interest corruption can become our educated past.
Profit-shifting for tax dodging purposes by unethical corporations and individuals harms developing and built-up countries alike. It’s corrupt and wears down the dignity of the human person. We will never achieve macroeconomic stability, equitable growth and social transformation yielding to the pressures imposed by self-interested lenders and investors. We must stop giving unscrupulous multinational corporations the extensive tax exemptions that harm us. But without proper in-house funding our past has proven we’ll have no choice. Yet corruption does not bind us—our responsibility to serve the people does.
Ideally, taxes fulfil human rights. They’re allowed to be pro-civil society and pro-environment. They’re meant to help people living in poverty, the disabled, children and other sidelined groups. Unfair loads on people and especially single mothers and fathers are not necessary.
Tax rivalry between countries is harmful and tax standards decision-making should not exclude half of the world’s countries. The World Conference on Human Rights affirms the importance of inclusion. If the world’s Governments have the funding they need there won’t be tax treaty issues hindering sustainable development.
Our human rights connect us and we need one another. Regardless of political, economic, or cultural approach it's the duty of all States to promote and protect all human rights and fundamental freedoms. It’s lawful for Governments to remove the causes and obstacles to peoples’ enjoyment of their rights. We’re entitled to happiness.
As stated in the Declaration on the Right to Development, the human person is the central subject of development. The right to evolve is universal. Tomorrow’s children should not inherit our problems.
Worldwide balance and health strengthens peace and friendship among nations improving economic development. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE backing the United Nations family conforms to the Charter as well as its related Agencies and Organizations.
Reassigning education, health and necessary services away from public-interested government to private self-interested actors biased towards their own profit was bad. We can reverse this.
People have a right to choose. However services that are citizen benefits for those who cannot otherwise afford them need funding not self-ish profiting. Governments having ability to provide services as citizen benefits will not take away ability of private self-interested actors to offer similar services for profit to those who can afford them.
The State gives the United Nations all funding necessary for education, health and necessary services. The State gives funding for disaster relief, refugee relief and World Bank Group Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility. Containment of health crises like Ebola and other serious needs should have financing immediately rather than in months. The State wants nothing in return.
The State gives the United Nations all funding necessary for peacekeeping efforts and especially to support our International Criminal Police Organization-INTERPOL. Assuring business friendly areas increases both make and use of local goods and services as well as ensuring public safety. Inventions, science, technical experts and machinery help achieve Government goals especially in undeveloped countries as well as those hit by conflict. Most importantly all people have an unalienable right to live free of terror.
The African Union Agenda 2063 reminds us “shared fortune returns”. The International Business Forum held with the Third International Conference on Financing for Development secured this new model of cooperation. The World Bank Group as well as multinational corporations have already put this into action. [80] Yet we will find our greatest allies in the unexpressed talents—of people.
Everyone has inborn abilities starving for training, success and usefulness. Creating only “decent” work is cruel. It does not fully allow us to express who we are. It does not provide us a way to contribute and feel good. The result of universal funding for all forms of education will aid change to our consumption and production patterns, aid new types of work creation and help us to feel good about ourselves. Training for new technology, green energy, science, dance, music, film and other arts provide eco-friendly products that enrich everyone. Investing in people is critical for present and future generations. It’s necessary, not only for our survival, but also for our happiness.
Every country is responsible for how it inspires its people to use goods and services. Promoting commodities intended to be “used-up-quickly” is leading us to our ruin. We need more goods and services from knowledge, science, technology, art and community culture. Community centres and events bring people more enjoyment of life and strengthens safety and peacekeeping efforts. Most importantly we should not force indigenous and first nation people into something they are not. The right to self-determinism includes truthful self-expression. It cannot exclude it. We need to start thinking outside the “product” box.
The World Trade Organization negotiates our trade rules. However landlocked developing States cannot benefit from trade the way wealthier countries do. Exports are uneven because of their smaller size. The voice of developing countries is too small in financial standard and norm-setting bodies even though international policymaking bodies incorporate them.
Countries coming out of conflict cannot bring in foreign investment the way safer and more stable communities can. Their communities need funding on many levels and this funding must be for the benefit of their people and not solely profit-seeking. This specially applies to refugees where compassion not only inspires us to help but demands it.
Because of their small size, remoteness and narrow export base, we must also support small island developing States. Sympathetic funding can turn unique circumstance into shared assets. Each of us has something special to contribute. It’s not necessary to change who we are—just how we do it.
Foreign investments in extractive industries and agricultural investments result in land grabbing, starving local people, destroying forests, polluting rivers and causing other serious damage. It’s killing our earth which we should only use with the rights of future generations in mind.
Hoping private finance would solve sustainable development problems was futile. Civil society and several United Nations Member States knew unconditional support for public-private partnerships and blended financing instruments wasn’t ideal. It’s time now to let this false hope go.
Recognizing our developmental roles as States safeguards our ability to regulate in public interest. Private entities act for their own benefit. They could do more harm than good if we don’t also preserve our capacity to protect human rights.
Current investments from multiple sources including private finance are not enough. Trade alone cannot support decent work or fair and just development. History has shown it hasn’t helped us achieve our human rights goals or solve gender equality.
The medical community knows consumption is a “wasting” disease. Making more consumables (basically “stuff”) to use up more quickly is never going to be sustainable no matter who finances it. It’s just wasting earth’s resources.
Profit pandering cost us too much. If we are to change our past and current patterns, we must take special interest and bias out of the equation. The only way to do this is with ample government-funding. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is willing to gift all needed funding to close any gap. Protecting the rights of all life on earth will naturally bring the lasting sustainability we seek.
We have this capacity—to end poverty and development challenges putting human rights centre and protecting our shared earth.
o The State realizes the world’s Governments can only care for people to the extent they have funding. This is perhaps similar to parents with several children on a limited budget. Without enough money life circumstance can force some needs to go unmet. Plainly this isn’t corrupt or uncaring. No one would fault a loving parent who wants to provide but fails. Perhaps government flaws should have similar compassion. When circumstances threaten survival all of us sometimes make choices we should not. There is NO one among us who can claim otherwise. Importantly forgiveness will gain more than hate. We…did this to us…but together we can fix it.
Governments borrowing money instead of receiving funding is affecting our food, health, education, energy and other areas of development and survival. Entities acting solely for their own interests instead of the earth and its peoples’ welfare will not end poverty. Without special interest the world’s Governments are free to serve peoples interests.
We need our social partners such as our workers and employers’ organizations. Just Governments benefit from free and open discussion as well as group cooperative agreements. They aid accountability while increasing sustainability. We need our corporate business partners who will “do good” while making their profits. We need those who are on-board for everyone’s human rights…no matter what they look like, their religious beliefs, their born or even chosen gender, language they speak, sexual orientation, colour of skin or where they’re from. We need humanity to be inclusive and most importantly—humane.
Funding the United Nations allows all peace-loving Governments means to sustainable economic diversification. Embracing our differences increases profit for all. And we can support greater business productive capacities and have worldwide green energy while creating more job opportunities. Restoring earth’s balance can bring our own.
We can protect indigenous and traditional knowledge. As Governments it's our duty and right to protect not only the environment but also the rights of women, men, children and first nation peoples alike. We must secure earth’s future—for them. It's our contract now and for future generations and we’re bound to perform!
We don’t have to suffer our current historic levels of inequality. Our global family doesn’t have to suffer food and environment crisis, lack of public services and lack of jobs. Our Financing for Development mandate proved worldwide solidarity is not just an ideal but real. It's obvious all of us want to deliver a sustainable agenda.
As a species we have the power to transform the grotesque injustices in our co-created and shared world. We made it. We can change it.
The Addis Ababa Civil Society Forum on Financing for Development of 12 July 2015 proved our commitment is there. We proved our want for pro earth people-centred development finance. It's time to carry out our goals and now with full funding nothing legitimate can stop us.
Universal funding as gifts dealt out by Intergovernmental Organizations cannot exercise unfairness against any country. It can’t impose exclusive policy or negatively influence trade. It wipes out debt leaving human rights based trade, finance, technology, investment and sustainable development to prevail. We can have economic growth for all, an end to poverty and restore the Earth’s health. We can have true financial, social and environmental accountability once we put a stop to special interest funding.
States not only have—duties—to enforce universal standards in human rights, gender equality, labour and environment issues. States also have—rights—to uphold them. As States we have rights to uphold the “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women” and the “Convention on the Rights of the Child”.
The welfare of the world is depending on us. If we are to fully prepare children to live an individual life in society. If we are to bring them up in the spirit of ideals proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations—in the spirit of peace, dignity, toleration, freedom, equality and solidarity—then as Governments we must perform! This is no longer something we can dodge.
The resulting emergence of worldwide Government funding given to the United Nations as gifts will strengthen global capacity allowing us to reform our cold-blooded archetypes of finance. We have the right to set up global green energy, to preserve the planet for future generations and to transform our financing and development approach so it exceeds basic needs. It is the unalienable birthright of our species to reaffirm the supremacy of our human rights! It’s our unalienable birthright to protect our environment, our finance, our trade, our monetary rules and our policies we as a species created.
Our species has a right to become its potential!
The United Nations family has the right to deliver logic based political leadership consistent with humanity’s possibilities rather than its doom. As Governments we have a right to uphold our duties to assure the moral truths recognized in the International Bill of Human Rights. We have rights to be—kind—societies. As Governments:
o We have the right to fund mobility aids, assistive technology and support. The disabled have rights to equal access and barrier free environments for equal, effective and inclusive participation in society.
o We have the right to protect the role of native people and their traditional knowledge. They have rights to recognition, promotion and protection from misappropriation. Together we have the right to discover what would provide genuine remedy and then act on it.
The United Nations fought for the rights of the entire human family since its start. Our Millennium Declaration proved we—as Nations united—vowed to find lasting solutions. Now our relentless struggle is over. We won. Human rights prevailed. Slaughtering earth and humanity’s dignity ends!
It’s true most monetary policies have external spillover effects. However the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is without “traditional” exports—because its people cannot engage in commercial acts. The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 18 April 1961 binds the entire State population. Without traditional-type products or services to export demand-switching for lower exchange rates is pointless. Why strengthen external demand if there can’t be any? This cancels all possibility of would-be benefit from demand-creating effects of lower interest rates for domestic consumption. The State doesn’t need competitive gains so unidirectional intervention of currency exchange rates are useless.
In fact, unique to the State, is its ability to gain its own wealth merely by giving away its Millies. There is no other country that can claim this or afford this scale of neutrality without any trade agenda. For any other country to do so would be a disservice to their own peoples’ interests.
The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is also unique in that its specific population can’t induce any monetary effects as it ages. The normal issues of productivity slowdown, long-term unemployment and the need for continued low inflation are moot. It’s distinct population just doesn’t have these normal issues.
Integral to State humanitarian aims Government and private debt burdens will never exist for the State because of Article 30 of the IMF Agreement. This allows the State and one-hundred per cent of its people the unprecedented capacity to take care of their needs without market interference and without any move of the Millie’s exchange rate peg—EVER.
The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is uniquely free to be an unbiased goodwill egalitarian. The State is fittingly able to help with financial stability and security, international trade easing and higher employment rates. As Nations united there’s strength in our numbers. Together we can promote sustainable economic growth and stamp out poverty around the world.
The State void of military force poses no threat to global security. One middle-aged woman poses no threat against the full-effect of the entire General Assembly Member States combined forces. The State Department of Safety and Peacekeeping purpose is to provide for United Nations Peacekeepers. The State Department can gift air force action-financing for the common good fulfiling State duties under the Charter of the United Nations Article 45.
Under Article 48 any action carried out on decision by the Security Council must coordinate through our International Agencies. This assures correct use of any State peacekeeping-financing.
Under the Charter’s Article 39 the Security Council decides what measures we’ll take for international peace and security. However as settled under Article 48 the Security Council may call on each of us in different ways.
The Charter’s Article 26 makes clear…our goals for setting up and keeping international peace and security shall risk the least human lives and least economic cost. Chapter VII settles how we handle threats to peace, breaches of peace and aggressive acts. This Chapter’s Article 42 mandates we cannot send physical forces when other measures prove enough. These other measures as laid out in Article 41 make clear the Security Council may call on the Members of the United Nations to apply economic measures.
The Charter’s Article 43 binds the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE to contribute its fair share to peace and security upkeep. The State must act at Security Council call. The State points out the nature of these contributions are by special agreement and may include financial funding.
As Nations united we agreed under the Charter’s Article 26 it's the Security Council and Military Staff Committee who create any strategic armed force direction. As possibility exists for United Nations Peacekeepers or a Receiving State to protect the State Sovereign by special agreement instead of anyone directly employed by the State under its control, again, one—middle-aged unarmed woman—poses no threat.
The State doesn’t need a military and can fulfil its duty to contribute to peace and security without one. The State and its Sovereign will remain unarmed even if without other protection. The State and its Sovereign fully accept any resulting risk. This is logical as it assures the General Assembly State devotion to stand only for the common good of all. The Sovereign’s Will in this Instrument should prove this beyond doubt.
Economists argue the negative results of our monetary policies occur because we’re simply unwilling to react properly. But is it fair to expect any country (especially those less institutionally developed) to stop offsetting disturbances coming from another country when their duty is to protect the welfare of their own people?
It's true if all countries engage in “demand-switching” policies it will put humankind to a race to the bottom. However perhaps it's time to admit that we’re already good global citizens…all of us…and that we’ve just been doing the best we could with limited funding and unlimited needs. That “accounting” will never balance regardless of the spin we put on it.
It's time to change. It's time to receive. It's time to let our human rights help us. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE is willing, qualified and able. You’ve got your funding. Take it—for your people—receive.
The purpose of “goods” is to satisfy human wants. Though the State lacks commercial products to trade it gives freely its exported goods and services—its unending monetary support, out-of-the-box intellect, strategist personality, peaceful heart and unbiased problem-solving talents. With limited people to care for the State is remarkably free and uniquely able to devote itself to Member State friendships and projects benefiting all.
For example oceans need oysters to filter their waters but 80 per cent of earth’s oyster reefs are now dead. It’s no wonder 50 per cent of earth’s oceans are also dead—DEAD. Yet oyster farming is sustainable. Young oysters with softer shells will die in dirty acidic waters. But if we globally combine our efforts to introduce mature oysters into cleaner waters, together, we can create clean-water strongholds and expand once proved. Together we can restore earth’s oceans and create new local jobs and business opportunities. Oyster reefs provide habitat for other oceanic organisms helping re-establish life into our oceans. Oyster farming can also bring one of the most nutrient-dense foods to areas needing aid, feeding people and relieving pressure on land-based protein sources.
With enough funding today’s possibility becomes tomorrow’s reality. The State looks forward to new friendships and being a contributory teammate for global green energy, basic needs, education, health care, infrastructure, cultural heritage preservation, indigenous peoples’ enjoyment of rights, space exploration and more.
It’s true the population of the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE consists of only one woman until after her death. [81] But “jurisdiction” and “authority” mandate you cannot control what you did not create unless its original owner commands it. While subject matter jurisdiction can be tried the authority of original jurisdiction isn’t argued or won. It’s given. Unless the original owner allows it no one else holds this power. Authority to give this power belongs only to the person who originally owned it. Power gained by any other means is void. Only the original owner decides. This first instance of original jurisdiction is the original jurisdiction court. It only occurs the first instance not the second. This court, this suite, is the place of the sovereign man or woman human being not their agents.
Nature is the original Grantor who gives life and power to us. People are the original Grantors who give power to their agents…the world’s Governments. [82] This is why the United Nations must uphold human rights because agents act for their principals and cannot exclude them and because the word “lex” which means law is synonymous with “right”. Human rights and fundamental freedoms are the birthrights of all human beings. Protection and promotion of inherent rights is the first responsibility of all Governments.
From the Interparliamentary Union, Minutes of the twenty-fifth Conference held in Berlin from August 23 to 28, 1928; Published by the Interparliamentary Bureau (Lausanne etc. 1928)—pp. 525-527:
People are the original authors of law. Law in its most general and comprehensive sense means “rules of human conduct”. Laws are expressions of peoples’ will. Supremely people (as original and first authority of their own wills) hold this original power, right and authority to interpret and apply law—not their agents. The original jurisdiction of law came from and belongs to people. It’s their unalienable sovereign-will which gives any government its power. No one can gain it in ways excluded by law.
From Interparliamentary Union. Minutes of the Twenty-Fifth Conference held in Berlin from August 23 to 28, 1928; Published by the Interparliamentary Bureau (Lausanne etc. 1928)—pp. 525-527: (emphasis added)
Law does not exclude this—anywhere. Agents can never surpass their principals. It’s within peoples’ lawful right to evolve, contract and contribute to positive change. Innately the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE represents the element of humankind most safeguarded by the United Nations family since its beginning. Intrinsically the State is an important materialization of humanity’s right to evolve.
The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE now in its own stead joins the United Nations in the spirit of global partnership and solidarity. Our shared goals are universal in nature regardless of our different national realities. Let us not merely achieve our goals but instead surpass them together.
“Perfectum est cui nihil deest secundum suae perfectionis vel naturae modum.”
[That which lacks nothing of its
perfection or nature is perfect.]
– Well proved merit of law
“In this world there are countries where 50 % of ALL of their children die by the age of five. Each one of them unique in the world with a gift…a contribution…to add to our whole. Yet every year they’re dying by only the age of five because of OUR co-created and co-agreed mistaken-beliefs about the value of money. These children are dying because of poverty issues when they do not have to. Can you imagine the world we would live in if all these children flourished, made their own unique contribution, and gave their unique gifts away? Can you imagine the world we would live in IF EVERYONE had the necessary financial opportunities so they too could give their gifts away? WE are a magnificent species. It’s time we celebrate it.”
–
HE
HM Cynthia Mildred Miles, Sovereign.
See photo on Notification PDF page 87.
– The State Sovereign at two.
Deep gratitude goes to the United States of America for its previous Administration of this State territory. Thank you United States of America for safeguarding and protecting the unalienable rights to self-determinism of both the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE and its Sovereign. This Sovereign Nation State has great love, admiration, and respect for all of you…
Your values, dedicated service and sacrifices resulted in the freedom and safety of a vulnerable female child born 10 June 1964. Because of you her renown inimitable will exercised its birthright—turning ordinary Grantor into extraordinary social-interest Sovereign. It is the greatest State wish to carry this generosity forward.
The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE also wishes to thank the entire United Nations family. Your unyielding faith in essential human rights, teamwork for peace, promises kept and respect for equal rights and self-determination of all peoples secured this Sovereign Nation State appearance. We did this—together. To reassure the General Assembly the State Sovereign grants the following privilege normally reserved “private” under her unalienable right to privacy. Following are her own words in her personal capacity:
“Knowing the State Predecessor (the United States of America) accessed my acts as lawful and not a danger may prove enough for some. But for many it may not. Unfortunately I am the only one lawfully sanctioned to share it as my Predecessor swore oaths to protect my rights including among others my unalienable right to privacy. So I will sacrifice my right—for you—and consent to grant you this privilege to know me in ways even my closest friends have not. I stress privilege because you don’t have legitimate right to my private thoughts. They are mine and mine alone. Yet I also realize what I’ve done comes with a capacity that may concern some.
I suffered great tragedy starting early in my life. I suffered at the hands of others that infringed my rights in the most personal of ways. To get out from underneath my circumstances I had to do unfortunate acts to survive. For those who have suffered I share your suffering. For those who have made mistakes I share your shame.
Because of this I think I had a soulful need to ‘author me’…to choose who I was going to be irrespective of my circumstance. But circumstance does not decide who we are. Our choices do. What life’s circumstance takes from you or does to you cannot change your unalienable right to author who you are in the world. Neither do your mistakes in life cement your fate. But giving up will.
Perhaps my former guardians (my beloved Predecessor the United States of America) saw me and my ‘why’ even before I realized why I had a need to assert my rights in this way. And I know that what I’ve done makes me happy. I get to take the most horrific ‘lemons’ and author the most beautiful ‘lemonade’.
Each of us have this ability—to author ourselves as we see fit. If we are lawful and don’t harm others we’re allowed to express our rights to their fullest capacities.
My State, my gifts, my choice to love instead of hate is who I chose to be. It is my choice alone and I worked long and hard to get here. Perhaps what I’ve done will mean nothing to anyone but me. If this is not the case I hope you find benefit in whatever form is best for you.”
Above all the State and its Sovereign wish to thank all Indigenous Nations and their people. Aboriginal people across many continents heavily influenced the formative years of “Cynthia Mildred”. Through you and accepted by you without prejudice she came to know the value all of us have and that:
Most importantly you taught her the true meaning of “there is no difference”. Thank you for welcoming her as family. She has great respect for your way of life. She loves you deeply.
As the State is without military State internal law mandates Formal Reservation of Rights of Publicity upheld for its Sovereign for her protection throughout her lifetime. The State extends this Reservation after her death for a reasonable time of respect. [83] Everyone has legal right to control use of their name, their image and their likeness. Everyone has the right to be left alone and not have one's personality represented publicly without permission. The State asks for worldwide help in universally enforcing this Reservation of right. It includes every format. The only exceptions are when the Sovereign joins in at official United Nations and Intergovernmental Organization events in their exact room or participation location or solely when sanctioned in writing under official Government Seal. All previous permissions cancel.
Because of extortion, blackmail, libel and death threats made against the State Sovereign the State does not engage in social media. Because the perpetrators used these means for their crimes the State forbids against social media involvement in any form until otherwise expressed in writing. The State seeks cooperation in banning website owners from profiting on traffic increases because of the above illegal acts. The State seeks cooperation in banning cyberstalking and cyberbullying. The State seeks cooperation in banning website owners from profiting on traffic increases because of these illegal acts.
Since the State Sovereign cannot commercially profit from her name and persona no one else should either especially by unlawful means. This also applies to infringing use of her image and likeness in keywords and metatags or using her name to bring in traffic. Profiting from stolen intellectual property is illegal no matter the format or subtlety of misuse.
Because of theft and unauthorized altering of State artefacts the State seeks cooperation in banning the selling, publication and unauthorized distribution of State and State Sovereign artefacts of cultural and historic value.
Because of unethical acts by seeming greed-driven, corrupt, press-related individuals and wannabe actors—people whom the State Sovereign loves are also at risk. The State stresses right to privacy for private individuals is unalienable irrespective of their relation to someone public. The State seeks universal cooperation to uphold this truth. No one should be injured because of unethical self-interested greed. Self-interested greed is not an act of the peoples’ unalienable right to free speech. Instead it prostitutes the same right to free speech respectable press helps us preserve.
From the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, adopted by the Ninth International Conference of American States, Bogotá, Colombia, 1948—Article 5:
We should not credit words from profit-motivated-lying-thieves. Illegally motivated acts of aberrated, corrupt, money-driven, self-interested individuals reflect those individuals—not the State nor its Sovereign nor those she loves. Mere curiosity should not justify violating rights—ever. It’s not “news” for the public good. The State seeks cooperation in banning such disgraceful acts and their profit-making.
The State makes known extortionists who regularly contribute to reputable press unlawfully have in their possession 21 State Cloisonné Pins with the Sovereign’s personal Charge and State Flag. After several (unsuccessful) retrieval-attempts made by the State items appeared on the Internet suggesting death threats for the Sovereign and her loved ones. A picture of a tombstone with a name previously used by the Sovereign mysteriously and newly appeared indexed in search results for the State. An unusually high number of obituaries mysteriously and newly appeared indexed in search results of the Sovereign’s loved ones. Most disturbingly the extortionists started legal action—not where the extortionists do business but out-of-state in the exact neighbourhood of elderly relatives of the Sovereign. Less than two-miles away from them to be exact.
Hints of death of the Sovereign, her loved ones and making their private information public have saddened the State. This is ghastly and deplorable behaviour by anyone’s standards. The Sovereign went to extreme lengths to protect her loved ones having parted ways with everyone years ago. To this day she visits none of them. Blackmail, extortion, libel, slander and death threats are all illegal. The State seeks cooperation in banning such acts but more importantly protection for future possible victims. [84] The State seeks cooperation in banning the selling, publication and unauthorized distribution of private and personal information about the State Sovereign and those who’ve ever known her.
==> The State points out—no one—but its Sovereign legally has State Cloisonné Pins.
The State was not negligent about the seventy-first General Assembly session opening-date and its participation needs. [85] As some of you know 2015 brought unethical acts which thwarted State appearance at the seventieth session. [86] Again in 2016 the State overcame similar obstacles and was ready to attend. However State Intelligence advised announcing after General Assembly session opening and after Annual Meetings of IMF and World Bank Group to keep risk of disruption low.
The Credentials Committee allows for late submissions. This seventy-first session they report on the afternoon plenary meeting of 12 December 2016 [item 3 (b)]. The State delivered proper forms before to assure participation in the seventy-first session. [87] Until necessary formalities complete the State only approves its Sovereign HE HM Cynthia Mildred Miles to speak on its behalf. The State apologizes for any disruption the historic precedent of this Succession of States brings.
The State points out it’s odd anyone risked so much prison time over deterring one middle-aged woman’s humanitarian aims. The State also points out it’s odd anyone would try to block all peace-loving nations from neutrally receiving financial aid. As these Governments have the capacity to subsidize local businesses one wonders “who” benefits exactly if the world’s Governments continue without the funding they need to provide fully for their people and local businesses?
If humanity wants to improve it needs to consider which acts it rewards and the calibre of people it recognizes as creditable. Irrespective the State will not stand down to sociopaths and this Succession of States is complete. Should anyone assassinate the State Sovereign “Her Will” stands (here pp. 45-46) and the State Gifts continue in eternity.
With the greatest of respect, shared aims and friendship offered the transmission of the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE formal “DIPLOMATIC NOTE TO THE UNITED NATIONS FAMILY NOTIFICATION OF SUCCESSION OF STATES” is complete. State flags present with Notification to Headquarters and Offices in Geneva, Nairobi and Vienna.
“I maintain my right to love all equally.”
– The Sovereign’s Motto
“Until no one suffers from poverty, WE have not solved our own poverty.”
– The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE Motto
“We accept the dare!”
– The Miles Province Motto
IN SOLIDARITY AND IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have placed my sign-manual on this Instrument of “DIPLOMATIC NOTE TO THE UNITED NATIONS FAMILY NOTIFICATION OF SUCCESSION OF STATES” satisfying Notification of Succession of States with full powers at Miles Province on 8 December 2016.
See photo on Notification PDF page 96.
I did this for you.
Love,
See photo on Notification PDF page 96.
______________________________________________________________________
HE HM Cynthia Mildred Miles, CES Head of State, Sovereign and Minister of Foreign Affairs
[1] See Charter of the United Nations of 26 June 1945 (emphasis added): “Preamble—We the peoples of the United Nations...Article 2 (1)—The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members… Article 8—The United Nations shall place no restrictions on the eligibility of men and women to participate in any capacity and under conditions of equality in its principal and subsidiary organs.”
[2] See Atlantic Charter of 14 August 1941: “3. They respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live; and they wish to see sovereign rights and self-government restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them.” (NOTE: This Charter was confirmed by all Allies of World War II.)
[3] See Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties of 23 August 1978: Article 2, (g) “notification of succession” means in relation to a multilateral treaty any notification, however phrased or named, made by a successor State expressing its consent to be considered as bound by the treaty;
[4] See Treaty for the Renunciation of War (Kellogg-Briand Pact, Paris, 1928): "Article 1. The High Contracting Parties solemnly declare, in the names of their respective peoples…"
[5] Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Revised Sixth Edition—1856 (emphasis added): "PRINCIPAL...4. A principal has rights which he can enforce and is liable to obligations which he must perform. These will be briefly considered: 1. The rights to which principals are entitled arise from obligations due to them by their agents, or by third persons."
[6] Sèances et Travaux de l'Union Juridique Internationale, 1920, vol. 2.: “Article VI. In the accomplishment of their duties, as in the exercise of their rights, States must be inspired by the thought that their mission is the joint pursuit of human welfare through the progress of civilization.”
[7] See p. 65 of the United Nations Document A/CN.4/2 of 15 December 1948 – Memorandum submitted by the Secretary-General: “p. 60—Abbe Gregoire (1793) 2. The nations are respectively independent and sovereign whatever may be the number of inhabitants composing them and the extent of the territory which they occupy.” – Emphasis added.
[8] The Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Nations Adopted by the American Institute of International Law of 27 April 1916, pp. 87-88 (emphasis added): “Whereas these fundamental rights, thus universally recognized, create a duty on the part of the peoples of all nations to observe them; and Whereas, according to the political philosophy of the Declaration of Independence of the United States and the universal practice of the American Republics, nations or Governments are regarded as created by the people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed and are instituted among men to promote their safety and happiness and to secure to the people the enjoyment of their fundamental rights…III. Every nation is in law and before law the equal of every other nation belonging to the society of nations and all nations have the right to claim and, according to the Declaration of Independence of the United States, ‘to assume, among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them’...V. Every nation entitled to a right by the law of nations is entitled to have that right respected and protected by all other nations, for right and duty are correlative and the right of one is the duty of all to observe.”
[9] See Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations of 21 March 1986, Article 74, ¶ 1 (emphasis added) — “The provisions of the present Convention shall not prejudge any question that may arise in regard to a treaty between one or more States and one or more international organizations from a succession of States….”; Article 26 Pacta sunt servanda — “Every treaty in force is binding upon the parties to it and must be performed by them in good faith…”; and Article 27 Internal law of States, rules of international organizations and observance of treaties — ¶ 2. "An international organization party to a treaty may not invoke the rules of the organization as justification for its failure to perform the treaty..."
[10] Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties of 23 August 1978—Article 19, Participation in treaties signed by the predecessor State subject to ratification, acceptance or approval: “1. Subject to paragraphs 3 and 4, if before the date of the succession of States the predecessor State signed a multilateral treaty subject to ratification, acceptance or approval and by the signature intended that the treaty should extend to the territory to which the succession of States relates, the newly independent State may ratify, accept or approve the treaty as if it had signed that treaty and may thereby become a party or a contracting State to it. 2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, unless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established, the signature by the predecessor State of a treaty is considered to express the intention that the treaty should extend to the entire territory for the international relations of which the predecessor State was responsible.” See also Articles 17 and 18.
[11] Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties of 23 August 1978—Article 20 Reservations: “1. When a newly independent State establishes its status as a party or as a contracting State to a multilateral treaty by a notification of succession under article 17 or 18, it shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation.”
[12] See also Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969—Article 27 Internal law and observance of treaties: “A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”
[13] Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties of 23 August 1978—Article 23 Effects of a notification of succession: “2. Nevertheless, the operation of the treaty shall be considered as suspended as between the newly independent State and the other parties to the treaty until the date of making of the notification of succession except insofar as that treaty may be applied provisionally in accordance with article 27 or as may be otherwise agreed.”
[14] RESERVATIONS for Convention on Succession of States in Respect of State Property, Archives and Debts of 8 April 1983
1) See VCIJIS Case 2011045129.
2) See Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969—Article 20, § 5.
a. See Parties served in VCIJIS Case 2011045129 which include inter alia Authorized Government Contact Persons for 130 Countries.
i. The State stresses 130 countries accepted without contest or objection HM Cynthia Mildred Miles’ offer to stand as Surety of Peace as a Financial Liable Party for all debt. Universality Principle was invoked.
See photo on Notification PDF page 11.
3) No one ever brought any evidence to dispute the following direct known material facts:
a. HM Cynthia Mildred Miles did not willfully evade any lawful act of any lawful California peace officer. Colour of law is not law. United States and California law prove HM Cynthia Mildred Miles had a right to resist unlawful arrest. Safely stopping only where there were witnesses who knew her because she feared for her life after years of assault was necessary to protect her life. See:
i. “Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self-defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100). – Emphasis added.
ii. “Appearance ticket is not accusatory instrument and its filing does not confer jurisdiction over defendant.” People v. Gabbay, 670 N.Y. S. 2d 962, 175 Misc. 2d 421 appeal denied 678 N.Y. S. 2d 26, 92 N.Y.2d 879, 700 N.E. 2d 564 (1997). – Emphasis added.
b. No suspended driver’s license for the State Sovereign existed on 23 December 2011. Her “Miles Province International Driver License” issued on 20 May 2011 was current as it was valid through 10 June 2016. California issued “California Driver License Number D4154408” on 14 June 2005—before the State succession. It expired on 10 June 2010—more than a year and a half before the related incident in VCIJIS Case 2011045129. The Sovereign swore and affirmed “Oath Purgatory” on formal court record on 20 August 2006—nearly four years prior. Notice was publicly published in Pahrump Valley Times. The State served notice of its “Cancellatura of Foreign Instruments” 16 February 2007 more than three years before the related incident. See Certified Mail Tracking Numbers 7004 1160 0000 6696 1270 (United States Treasury), 7004 1160 0000 6696 1263 (United States Secretary of State) and 7004 1160 0000 6696 1256 (California Secretary of State). There is no evidence of any other Driver License ever being issued. None exists! There can be no suspended (license) where there is no license! See:
i. “No valid conviction can occur if the charging instrument is void.” State v. Wilson, 6 S.W. 3d 504 (1998). – Emphasis added.
ii. California Vehicle Code Section 20: “It is unlawful to…knowingly make any false statement or knowingly conceal any material fact in any document filed with the Department of Motor Vehicles or the Department of the California Highway Patrol.”
iii. “Acting under color of [state] law is misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law.” Thompson v. Zirkle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77654 (N.D. Ind. Oct. 17, 2007). – Emphasis added.
iv. California Government Code, General Provisions, Title 1, Division 7, Chapter 3: Crimes Relating to Public Records, Documents and Certificates, see §§ 6200-6203.
c. The State Truck had State registration and State plates in good order. The Sovereign secured plates with key-locks through the trucks bumpers making them impossible to remove without disassembling the truck. The State returned previously issued California plates to California which were received by its Governor on 23 March 2011 at 9:59 AM Pacific Standard Time. See Certified Mail Tracking Number 7008 1830 0000 2973 4703. The State served notice eighteen months before it issued State plates and registration by Miles Province. The State offered to get diplomatic plates and registration and pay all fees associated if its own were u nacceptable to California or the United States. Instead the State Truck was forcefully taken and seems sold. The United States Department of Justice requires a “California Highway Patrol 180 Form” given within 48-hours of law officers taking a vehicle. To this day the State has never received one as needed by law nor has any idea what happened to its truck. The truck’s retail value when new was roughly $55,000.00 USD. See:
See photo on Notification PDF page 13.
See photo on Notification PDF page 13.
i. “To presume that a sovereign forever waives the right to exercise one of its powers unless it expressly reserves the right to exercise that power in a commercial agreement turns the concept of sovereignty on its head.” MERRION ET AL., DBA MERRION & BAYLESS, ET AL. v. JICARILLA APACHE TRIBE ET AL. 1982. SCT. 394, 455 U.S. 130, 102 S. Ct. 894, 71 L. Ed. 2d 21, 50 U.S. L. W. 4169 pp. 144-148. – Emphasis added.
ii. “ The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right.” Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941 – Emphasis added.
iii. California Civil Code § 1708: “Every person is bound, without contract, to abstain from injuring the person or property of another, or infringing upon any of his or her rights.”
iv. The State highlights LASC Case BP125551 well-documented the truck as the Sovereign’s only home throughout that Case because of expenses for a life-threatening medical situation. A commercial financial institution’s refusal (as Trustee) to release money for medical care while controlling roughly $3.8 million dollars of inheritance was the subject of this Case. This same Financial Institution and Trustee seems to have been the transfer agent and broker for California Treasurer of Los Angeles County at the same time.
See photo on Notification PDF page 14.
See photo on Notification PDF page 14.
1. The damage of this Case was well-known by the California law enforcement officers who forcibly took the truck.
2. Taking the truck and what followed in VCIJIS Case 2011045129 forced the State Sovereign (a middle-aged disabled woman) to survive on foot (in winter) for many months to preserve defence of her rightful administration of her territory. It also delayed medical care for new spinal injuries related to VCIJIS Case 2011045129.
v. After the Sovereign received money related to the LASC Case BP125551 the California Franchise Tax Board levied the State Central Bank account (without proper notice or cause). This was years after California recognized the State Succession. The money taken was for a tax year the United States Internal Revenue Service found the State was not responsible for.
1. The United States Internal Revenue Service audited the State Sovereign before the Succession of States began. They found the Sovereign had paid too much in taxes and refunded her nearly $100,000.00.
vi. Before the Succession of States began the State Sovereign had good relations with law enforcement. She volunteered her talents, without pay, for law enforcement agencies in both Arizona and California. Examples include police training (Phoenix) and gaining information (Los Angeles). The latter related to an international child molestation ring where a six-month-old baby girl died by rape with a knitting-needle during a snuff film shooting and required the Sovereign to go in on foot wearing a wire.
1. Phoenix Department of Public Safety recommendation stated, “In every case, she has conducted herself with utmost professionalism…” and she “endowed our programs with a credibility that is absolutely required”.
2. While the Sovereign’s talent was described as “formidable” it was stated that it was “her helpful and friendly nature that people who have worked with her remember most”. Overall her character was “whole-heartedly commended” praising, “Cynthia exudes quiet confidence and intelligence”.
vii. The State also highlights its Sovereign’s currency-exchange and interbank abilities. Her ability to double funds on account in roughly a month where not unheard of. The one-million-dollar-plus check ($1,175,799.36) she received from the LASC Case BP125551 (amount recorded on public record) would have provided enormous financial opportunity for her had she chosen “self-interest” over social-interest. See following proof.
viii. This is from 15 November 2009 (GBP/CAD). Notice the buy order (a square) was placed roughly five hours before execution of trade (the upward triangle is the fill). Notice market-price at time of order was far away from its order asking-price. Also notice the extent of the market move and how much was “taken”. The circle denotes a prior ordered sell stop-exit not a “manual” close. A manual-close would have appeared as a downward triangle. In other words, Cynthia calculated and placed her order for the low and high price-points hours before the market moved—to nearly exact parameters. Analysis of global currency markets is her strong suit. This trade’s profit was more than 100 pips in roughly 12-hours. This was not an unusual trade. Importantly Central Banks should agree this trade’s placement timing (8 PM PST) and other keys market aspects prove beyond doubt this was not an impulsive lucky guess. But instead well-crafted execution on both entry and exit. To an insider this trade was obvious, patient and deliberate.
See photo on Notification PDF page 16.
d. The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE nor its Sovereign are responsible for California errors. United States and California law proves this.
i. See California Civil Code § 3526: “No man is responsible for that which no man can control.”
ii. “ Under our system the people, who are there called subjects, are the sovereign. Their rights, whether collective or individual, are not bound to give way to a sentiment of loyalty to the person of the monarch. The citizen here knows no person, however near to those in power, or however powerful himself, to whom he need yield the rights which the law secures to him when it is well administered. When he, in one of the courts of competent jurisdiction, has established his right to property, [106 U.S. 196, 209] there is no reason why deference to any person, natural or artificial, not even the United States, should prevent him from using the means which the law gives him for the protection and enforcement of that right.” U.S. v. LEE, 106 U.S. 196 (1882). – Emphasis added.
iii. “No legislature can bargain away the public health or the public morals. The people themselves cannot do it, much less their servants.” New Orleans Gas Co v. Louisiana Light Co., 115 U.S. 650 (1885). – Emphasis added.
iv. See California Civil Code § 3512: “One must not change his purpose to the injury of another.”
v. “ The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative.” Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am.Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7. – Emphasis added.
vi. See California Civil Code § 3546: “Things happen according to the ordinary course of nature and the ordinary habits of life.”
vii. “If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being a gift of ALMIGHTY GOD, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.” — Samuel Adams, 1772 – Emphasis added.
viii. “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot thus be converted into a crime.” Miller v. U.S., 230 F.2d 486, at 489 (1956) – Emphasis added.
ix. See California Civil Code § 3517: “No one can take advantage of his own wrong.”
4) California recognized HM Cynthia Mildred Miles’ sovereignty, immunity and the State Succession before the incident related to VCIJIS Case 2011045129 on 23 December 2011. Recognition is irrevocable for all conditions. International law guarantees California may NOT invoke its internal law to justify improper conduct! International law guaranteed CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE and its Sovereign right to assert themselves.
a. See United States Code, Title 28, § 1782 (a): “…A person may not be compelled to give his testimony or statement or to produce a document or other thing in violation of any legally applicable privilege.”
b. The United States of America is a contracting party to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969—See Article 27: “A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”
i. California is part of the United States’ territory and must obey this treaty.
c. The United States of America is a contracting party to the Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States of 26 December 1934.
i. California is part of the United States’ territory and must obey this treaty:
1. See Article 3: “…Even before recognition the state has the right to defend its integrity and independence...The exercise of these rights has no other limitation than the exercise of the rights of other states according to international law.” [Not California internal law.] – Emphasis added.
2. See Article 4: “...The rights of each one do not depend upon the power which it possesses to assure its exercise, but upon the simple fact of its existence as a person under international law.”
3. See Article 5: “The fundamental rights of states are not susceptible of being affected in any manner whatsoever.”
4. See Article 6: “...Recognition is unconditional and irrevocable.”
5. See Article 7: “ The recognition of a state may be express or tacit. The latter results from any act which implies the intention of recognizing the new state.”
d. See verification that California Commission on Judicial Performance recognized the State and it’s Sovereign.
See photo on Notification PDF page 18.
e. See Hague Apostille 509964 CERTIFIED on 14 March 2008—VCIJIS Case 2011045129 is for an incident that took place on 23 December 2011…more than 3 ½ years after California recorded and certified recognition!
f. See LASC Case BP125551—filling date 12 November 2010…more than a year before VCIJIS Case 2011045129 and its incident that took place on 23 December 2011.
i. See LASC Case BP125551, Case Summary, where the State Sovereign is listed twice confirming recognition of her legal status, mental competence and legal standing as Successor to Predecessor United States of America.
ii. See LASC Case BP125551, Minute Order of 8 February 2011, where the Sovereign’s immunity is confirmed and recognized no less than eleven times and where the Court recorded and recognized the Sovereign’s will, recording her refusal to waive her immunity…again…before VCIJIS Case 2011045129 and its incident on 23 December 2011.
g. See California Government Code § 11120: "It is the public policy of this state that... The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them." – Emphasis added.
h. See California Government Code § 54950: "In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares... The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them." – Emphasis added.
i. “No action can be taken against a sovereign in the non-constitutional courts of either the united states or the state courts and any such actions is considered the crime of Barratry. Barratry is an offense at common law.” State v. Batson, 17 S.E. 2d 511, 512, 513. – Emphasis added.
j. “Jurisdiction over a defendant requires both personal and subject matter jurisdiction.” Boles v. State, 717 So. 2d 877 (1998).
k. “A court is without power to render a judgment if it lacks jurisdiction of the parties or of the subject matter...In such cases, the judgment is void, has no authority and may be impeached.” O'Leary v. Waterbury Title Co., 117 Conn 39, 43, 166 A. 673. – Emphasis added.
l. “Lack of jurisdiction cannot be cured by consent or waived by entry of a guilty plea; doctrine of waiver cannot be effective when court lacks jurisdiction over the case itself.” Harrell v. State, 721 So. 2d 1185 rehearing denied, review dismissed 728 So. 2d 205 (1998). – Emphasis added.
m. “Parties cannot confer subject matter jurisdiction upon judicial tribunal by either acquiescence or consent; nor may subject matter jurisdiction be created by waiver, estoppel, consent, or conduct of parties.” State v. Trevino, 556 N.W. 2d 638, 251 Neb. 344 (1996). – Emphasis added.
n. “Where the court is without jurisdiction, it has no authority to do anything other than to dismiss the case.” Fontenot v. State, 932 S.W. 2d 185. – Emphasis added.
5) Without admission of guilt the State made a gesture of goodwill and paid all administerial costs related to VCIJIS Case Numbers 2011555866, 2011548781, 2010633019 and 2007624134.The State also mailed a check for all administerial costs and a copy of this Notification to the court for VCIJIS Case 2011045129. The State also mailed Notification copies to California Governor, California Secretary of State, California Treasurer, United States President Incumbent, United States President Elect, United States Secretary of State and United States Department of the Treasury.
a. “It is well-established, commonly known and understood that a payment is the act of two parties, the party tendering the debt and the party receiving it; and that the money or thing due must be accepted.” 7 Pick 88; 4 Pick. 83; 8 Pick. 122 – Emphasis added.
b. See United States Code, Title 28, § 1782 (b): “This chapter does not preclude a person within the United States from voluntarily giving his testimony or statement, or producing a document or other thing, for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal before any person and in any manner acceptable to him.” – Emphasis added.
6) The State properly obeyed applicable treaties and gave needed specifics to both California and United States Offices of Protocol.
a. See United States Department of Justice Reference Number 189-23-16-1.
o United States Code, Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 77, Peonage, Slavery and Trafficking in Persons—§ 1581. Peonage; obstructing enforcement: “(a) Whoever holds or returns any person to a condition of peonage, or arrests any person with the intent of placing him in or returning him to a condition of peonage, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.”
o Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969—Article 27 Internal law and observance of treaties: “A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty.”
[15] DECLARATION OF OBLIGATION ACCEPTANCE for Charter of the United Nations of 26 June 1945
[16] DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION OF INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE for Charter of the United Nations of 26 June 1945
[17] DECLARATION OF MISSIONS TO THE UNITED NATIONS for Charter of the United Nations of 26 June 1945
o See also Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character of 14 March 1975.
[18] REQUEST FOR DIPLOMATIC PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES for Charter of the United Nations of 26 June 1945
o Cover Letter under Seal
o Five Photos (passport size, in colour, taken within this month)
o Copy of current CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE Passport
o Copy of former United States Passport
o Printed Copy of Form I-94 for Her Excellency HM Cynthia Mildred Miles
o United Nations Building Pass Form SG.32 for Her Excellency HM Cynthia Mildred Miles
o United Nations Registrations of Members of Permanent Missions Form SG.5 for Her Excellency HM Cynthia Mildred Miles
[19] LETTER TO PRESENT CREDENTIALS for Charter of the United Nations of 26 June 1945
o I have appointed and by these presents do confirm as Permanent Representative to the United Nations (myself) Her Excellency HM Cynthia Mildred Miles the State Ambassador Extraordinary Plenipotentiary. Thus I shall represent the Government of the CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE in all organs of the United Nations throughout my lifetime. I am authorized to designate a substitute to act temporarily on my behalf after due notice to the Secretary-General.
o This accreditation of credentials stands ongoing and renews for each General Assembly Session throughout my lifetime.
o The State will accredit other non-life term representatives later.
o On my death my “Will” (contained within this Notification, pp. 45-46, shall express State intent for future credential accreditations for State Representatives to the United Nations General Assembly Sessions.
[20] See Charter of the United Nations of 26 June 1945—Articles 110 and 111.
[21] DECLARATION ABOUT PROVISIONS for Revised General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes of 28 April 1949
[22] RESERVATIONS for Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character of 14 March 1975
[23] DECLARATION OF APPLICATION for Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies of 21 November 1947
[24] DECLARATIONS OF ACCEPTANCE AND CALL TO TRANSMIT SUBSCRIPTION FUNDS for Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund of 27 December 1945
[25] DECLARATION OF INSTRUMENT SETTING FORTH PARTICIPATION IN SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS DEPARTMENT for Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund of 27 December 1945
o (1) IMF Managing Director Ms. Christine Lagarde, IMF, 700 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20431
o (2) Special Representative of the IMF to the United Nations Mr. Axel Bertuch-Samuels, One Dag Hammarskjöld Plaza, 885 Second Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10017
[26] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund of 27 December 1945—Article 31, § 2, ¶ (a).
[27] RESERVATIONS for Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 18 April 1961
[28] See Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States of 26 December 1934, Articles 3, 4 and 5.
[29] See Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States of 26 December 1934, Article 11.
[30] See Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties 23 August 1978, Article 13.
[31] See Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States of 26 December 1934, Article 10.
[32] See Universal Declaration of Human Rights of General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948—Article 15 ¶ 2: “2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.”
[33] See Cancellatura, Miles Province General-Post Office, Hague Apostille 509964 and LASC BP125551.
[34] See Nationality of Natural Persons in relation to the Succession of States of 1999 annexed to General Assembly resolution 55/153 of 12 December 2000.
[35] See Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969—Article 27 Internal law and observance of treaties: "A party may not invoke the provisions of its internal law as justification for its failure to perform a treaty."
[36] Territory, as a term, defines administrative divisions or political governing units while state is the contraction of estate.
[37] See p. 57 of the United Nations Document A/CN.4/2 of 15 December 1948 – Memorandum submitted by the Secretary-General (emphasis added): “p. 52—Francesco Cosentini (1935) 31. Right to constitute a State. Every people has the right to constitute itself as a State, under a supreme Power, in a given territory, by forming a legal entity with a view to the attainment of collective aims…”
[38] The lack of the use of capital letters here shows reference to the “substance” of the living essence rather than to the Estate “name”.
[39] HM Cynthia Mildred Miles, as Grantor of Record, is the original author and the sole corporal authority over her unalienable right to self-determinism. No one else can lawfully claim jurisdiction to the authorship and authority of self-determinism for this State!
[40] See Charter of the United Nations 26 June 1945—Article 8: “The United Nations shall place no restrictions on the eligibility of men and women to participate in any capacity and under conditions of equality in its principal and subsidiary organs.”
[41] See p. 74 of the United Nations Document A/CN.4/2 of 15 December 1948 – Memorandum submitted by the Secretary-General: “p. 69—Henri La Fontaine (1916) Article 25. The States are equal, whatever may be the extent of their territory or the importance of their population…”
[42] See IMF Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual Sixth Edition (BPM6), Chapter 5 Classifications of Financial Assets and Liabilities, A. Definitions of Economic Assets and Liabilities, 4. Financial assets, Provisions for calls under standardized guarantees—
[43] See—inter alia—IMF Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual Sixth Edition (BPM6)
o E. Other Investment
o B. Other Changes in the Volume of Financial Assets and Liabilities
o A. Overview of the Goods and Services Account
o B. Goods
o C. Capital Transfers
o Article 5. Operations and Transactions of the Fund
o Article 30. Explanation of Terms
[44] See Hague Apostille 509964
o “The recognition of a state may be express or tacit. The latter results from any act which implies the intention of recognizing the new state.”
[45] See Charter of the United Nations 26 June 1945, Article 104.
[46] See Charter of the United Nations 26 June 1945, Article 105.
[47] See By-Laws and Rules and Regulations of the IMF, as amended to April 7, 2016—Section 1. Places of Business.
[48] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945— Article 4, § 1 and Article 4, § 3 (a) and (b).
[49] See Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies of 21 November 1947.
[50] See Annex of General Assembly resolution 49/60 of 9 December 1994.
[51] See General Assembly resolution 51/210 of 17 December 1996.
[52] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945—Article 4, § 1, ¶¶ (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv).
[53] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945, Article 2, ¶¶ (ii), (v) and (vi).
[54] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945, Article 3, § 4 and Article 13, § 2.
[55] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945, Article 13, § 2, ¶¶ (a) and (b).
[56] See Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 18 April 1961—Article 42 (emphasis added): A diplomatic agent shall not in the receiving State practise for personal profit any professional or commercial activity.
[57] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945—Article 2, § 1.
[58] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945—Article 30, especially § (d)(4) which provides for moderate family living expenses without limit.
[59] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945—Article 5: Operations and Transactions of the Fund—Section 2. Limitation on the Fund’s operations and transactions: (b) If requested, the Fund may decide to perform financial and technical services, including the administration of resources contributed by members …
[60] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945—Article 1, ¶¶ (ii) and (v).
[61] See Charter of the United Nations of 26 June 1945, Chapter 19, Articles 110 and 111.
[62] See Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945—Article 13, § 1.
[63] For example, see Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund 27 December 1945—Article 12, § 5, ¶ (a)(ii).
[64] See Sèances et Travaux de l'Union Juridique Internationale, 1920, vol. 2:
(a) Openly maintain international relations founded upon justice and equity;
(b) Rigorously observe the rules of international law;
(c) Scrupulously respect treaties;
(d) Execute in good faith the judgements rendered by Tribunals of Arbitration;
(e) Not have recourse to arms without having exhausted all peaceful means for the settlement of disputes;
(t) Unite their efforts to anticipate, prevent and eventually put an end to wars;
(g) Participate in the creation, functioning and development of all international services.
o p. 44: “p. 38, ¶ 21, Maintenance of Conditions Calculated to Ensure International Peace and Order—It is the duty of every State to ensure that the conditions prevailing within its territory do not threaten international peace and order and, to that end, it must treat its own population in a manner which does not violate the dictates of humanity and justice, or offend the conscience of mankind.”
o p.74: “p.69, Albert de Lapradelle (1921)—Article 2. Without distinction of race or religion, or of power, States are, in proportion to their degree of civilization, that is to say, of consciousness of their international duties, free and equal in law.”
[65] See p. 60 of United Nations Document A/CN.4/2 of 15 December 1948 – Memorandum submitted by the Secretary-General (emphasis added): “p. 55, Albert de Lapradelle (1921)—Article 1. Every people which has established in the territory which it occupies a Government capable of maintaining order internally and of cooperating externally in the continually developing organization of relations founded upon the common good, justice and peace, is entitled to international recognition of its nation as a State.”
[66] See Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Revised Sixth Edition—1856 (emphasis added): “NATIONS. 2. But every combination of men who govern themselves, independently of all others, will not be considered a nation; a body of pirates, for example, who govern themselves, are not a nation. To constitute a nation another ingredient is required. The body thus formed must respect other nations in general and each of their members in particular. Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person who possesses an understanding and will peculiar to herself and is susceptible of obligations and rights. Vattel, Prelim. §1, 2; 5 Pet. S. C. R. 52.”
[67] See Hague Apostille 509964. See also LASC Case Number BP125551.
[68] See Hague Apostille 509964, LASC Case Number BP125551 and the Miles Province General Post Office (active and operational since 14 March 2011 through present time).
[69] See Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States of 26 December 1934—Article 7 (emphasis added): “The recognition of a state may be express or tacit. The latter results from any act which implies the intention of recognizing the new state.”
[70] See Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States of 26 December 1934—Article 6: “Recognition is unconditional and irrevocable.”
[71] See Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States of 26 December 1934, Articles 2.
[72] See LASC BP125551 Case Parties, specifically “Attorney for Objector” and “Objector”.
[73] See Miles Province General-Post Office mail and VCIJIS Case 2011045129 “Surety of Peace” offer Court recorded as served by Process of Service to 130 countries.
[74] See Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties 23 August 1978, Articles 7 ¶ 1 and 8 ¶ 2.
[75] See Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties 23 August 1978, Articles 3, 17 and 19. See also Charter of the United Nations 26 June 1945, Articles 1 ¶ 2, 4 ¶¶ 1-2, 8 and Article 18 ¶ 2; and the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly A/520/Rev.17, Rules 83 and 86.
[76] NOTE: United Nations membership doesn’t need consent of all parties nor all contracting States. Security Council recommendation for admission needs 9 of the 15 members—not all of them. Admitting new members to the United Nations needs the majority or only two-thirds of the members who are present and voting—not all members. Rule 86 of Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly defines “members present and voting” as members casting votes. Members not voting or absent are not included. These figures are plainly less than “all”. Clearly the United Nations doesn’t need consent of all parties or all contracting States.
[77] See Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties 23 August 1978, Articles 6 and 13. See also Charter of the United Nations 26 June 1945, Articles 1 ¶ 2.
[78] See Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties 23 August 1978, Article 23.
[79] See Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties 23 August 1978, Article 2, § 1, ¶ g and also Article 22.
[80] “With the end of the Millennium Development Goals and the introduction of the Sustainable Development Goals comes an opportunity to make important changes in how we approach development....Tackling this challenge requires us to think creatively and act collaboratively.... These initiatives are underpinned by a simple idea: to have a big impact, we must share ideas and collaborate. …To go from billions in official assistance to trillions in investments, we will have to push even further our willingness to collaborate through creative partnerships. All the world is watching us in Addis to see if our aspirations and courage will match those of the nearly billion people who live in extreme poverty today. Only by doing so can we be the first generation in human history to end extreme poverty in our lifetime.” – Jim Yong Kim, World Bank Group President at the Third International Conference on Financing for Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[81] The Inter-American Juridical Committee of 1942: “In like manner this juridical equality is independent of the territorial size of the particular State or of the degree of its material progress.”
[82] See United Nations editing style-sheet regarding the preferred editing style for the word “government”: “Capitalize as a noun or adjective when making reference to a Government representing a State, but lowercase when not specific.”
[83] The CYNTHIA MILDRED MILES ESTATE stresses it has—NOT—agreed to the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property of 2 December 2004. The State and its Sovereign expressly do not waive immunity or grant jurisdiction in such matters!
[84] California Penal Code §§ 633, 633.05 and 633.5.
[85] See Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly—A/520/Rev.17, Chapter 4—Credentials, Submission of credentials, Rule 27.
[86] See the State Diplomatic Note of 19 November 2015 to the United Nations.
[87] The State Head of State issued credentials for HM Cynthia Mildred Miles as State Representative and Delegate for all General Assembly Committees. The State delivered Form “A/INF/70/2 Membership of Main Committees of the General Assembly” and others to the United Nations Secretary-General, Secretary of the Credentials Committee and Protocol and Liaison Service before 12 December 2016 . Delivery was by courier, fax and or email to assure timely receipt in time for the Committee reporting in December. The State included copy of this Notification.